Fundamental and literal universality.
How Ismless + ism was discovered.
Re-inversion of valuations.
Learn from regional religions.
Literally Universal Religion (LUR).
How to get to space (practice nothing).
Different species (separation).
By inverse nature I mean that Jesus Christ reacted in an inverse way to the most of us, to offences, wrongs, insults and violence. This inverse nature is fundamental to Christianity and I will mention this inverse nature or practice of Christianity throughout this part. Friedrich Nietzsche philosophised that Judaism and Christianity were an inverse of valuations, in that, Judaism and Christianity are weak because they have compassion for and take care of the sick, poor and ill-constituted. This Nietzschean inversion of valuations or what he calls slave morality is inverse to master morality represented by the noble and warrior-like ancient Greeks, Romans and other fair haired peoples. Nietzsche believed that Judaism had won an eternal victory over master morality when Rome converted to Christianity in 323 AD under emperor Constantine the Great. As you will see the Nazis, who were anti-Semitic and anti-Christian were inverse to this so called Jewish and Christian inversion of valuations or slave morality. The Nazis exemplified master morality as they were supposed to be the ‘master race’. I will attempt to demonstrate to you that through Nietzsche’s inversion of valuations the Nazis were inverse to Christianity and through Nietzsche’s master-slave morality, the Nazis made masters out of themselves and slaves out of the Israelites. Hence, the Nazis were philosophically and directly influenced by such antithetical, anti-Semitic and anti-Christian philosophers as Friedrich Nietzsche. Therefore, because Nietzsche designed the term inversion of valuations as a negative term to detract from Judaism and Christianity, I would like to propose (for convenience sake) a new good and positive inverse term to flip the inversion of valuations into something which we can actually use to copy the inverse practice of Christianity. This new term I would conveniently recommend to be ‘inverse nature’. It is called inverse nature because it is inverse to nature, the animal kingdom and predictable animal instincts. Nature is animal, amoral and natural, while inverse nature is human, moral and supernatural. As mentioned and as you will see Friedrich Nietzsche hated and looked down upon this so called supernatural inversion of valuations of the Jews and Christians. He believed that slave morality was weak because, unlike natural selection and the Darwinian theory of survival of the fittest theory, Judaism and Christianity had unnatural pity for the weak, poor, sick and ill-constituted. However, this inverse nature does not just apply to charity, compassion and pity for the weak, poor and sick, it also applies to offence and insult, in that like Jesus Christ, we should not react to offences and annoyances with quick anger and violence, but with calm and peace. Following such antithetical and anti-Christian German philosophers as Friedrich Nietzsche, the Nazis also believed in nature, natural selection and the Darwinian theory of survival of the fittest. Like Nietzsche, the Nazis saw Jewish and Christian compassion, pity and charity for the poor and sick as weak, repugnant and antithetical to their goals of in creating an Aryan master race. I will try to prove to you that thanks to such philosophers as Friedrich Nietzsche and scientists as Charles Darwin, the Nazis were inverse to Christian pity and compassion, and this is how they carried out the Holocaust. The question I have always asked or wanted to understand is how in the Literally Universal God (LUG)’s name did the Nazis in any way see what they were doing as right? I believe that we should all try to get into the head of the Nazis to try to ask and understand how they saw the Holocaust as in any way good or right? From a study of Nietzscheanism, Darwinism, paganism and the intellectual origins of the Holocaust I have established that the Nazis were spiritually heathen or 180° diametrically inverse to Christianity, they were 100% nature or natural (not supernatural), in that they believed in science, Darwinism and survival of the fittest theory, which is inverse to supernatural Judaism and Christianity. Hence, the Nazis culled off all human beings that they saw as weak and invalid through euthanasia. We should all try to copy Jesus Christ’s inverse nature, be charitable and have infinitely more patience with people. We should take insults, injustices and wrongs in an inverse way without becoming angry or annoyed. Hence, we should all try to be inverse, to have more patience.
Inversion of Christianity. (Friedrich Nietzsche).
This part of the essay is a study of many books related to the philosophical and intellectual origins of the Holocaust, which are all related; however, there is one theme that runs throughout this part and indeed all of the essay and that is Friedrich Nietzsche hated Christianity. I aim to demonstrate Nietzsche’s anti-Christian theories called the ‘inversion of valuations’ and ‘master-slave morality’, which are the inverse of love, pity, sympathy and compassion. Friedrich Nietzsche was a philosopher and writer, he was unbelievably articulate, literate and he danced with the pen; however, he was an ardent anti-Christian (and perhaps even anti-Semitic). Therefore, what I am aiming to explain to you is that before Nietzsche lost his sanity in 1889 (after he wrote the Anti-Christ, through his 13 or so philosophical books, Nietzsche made his philosophy the diametrical antithesis or inverse of pity, compassion and Christianity. He did this through his theories such as his ‘transvaluation of values’ (or his ‘inversion of valuations’) and his ‘master-slave morality’, which are the inverse of Christianity, charity, compassion and pity. These inverse theories of Nietzsche’s will be explained in depth later to you in this part. I also aim to prove to you that the reason why the Nazis were diametrically inverse to the charity, compassion and pity that the rest of us feel, is directly because of such as Friedrich Nietzsche’s 19th century anti-Christian philosophies and Charles Darwin’s animalistic natural selection and survival of the fittest theories. Both Nietzsche and Darwin (in a way) were inverse or antithetical to Christianity. I will also show you later that simple (even thick) piety and charity are much more important than intellect, science and academia. This is because you can imagine a highly educated person who is who isn’t particularly charitable, while on the other hand, you can imagine a very charitable layman. As you will see I have singled out and used Friedrich Nietzsche as just one example of many of the kind of anti-Semitic and anti-Christian German philosophers of the 19th century that helped to the psyche of the Holocaust. However, Nietzsche was honestly not bad and I have been too harsh on him. Charles Darwin also has a relation to the Holocaust as I will explain. Therefore, before I explain the philosophical and intellectual background of Nazism and the Holocaust, I wanted to state something. All of the following philosophers and scholars that I study and whose works I use to explain the intellectual origins of the Holocaust, including Friedrich Nietzsche, Jerry Bergman and Robert C. Holub, are infinitely wiser and more knowledgable than I about their respective fields, however, excepting Friedrich Nietzsche, the only criticism that I have of such academics is that none of them try to solve the Holocaust. In our politically correct world, it does not seem to matter how good scholars and professors become in recording the history, statistics and facts of the Holocaust and enlightening us about the origins and causes of the Holocaust, none them are able to offer a solution. I believe this is simply because people are far too scared of being seen as racist. I believe people are afraid of career suicide?
“If the world hates you, keep in mind that it hated me first.“
You may say how would finding a solution to the Holocaust do anything for Christianity? The Volk and German philosophers such as Friedrich Nietzsche were anti-Semitic and anti-Christian, therefore, the Holocaust destroyed Christianity and as you have seen with Islam today, Christianity is less secure. Firstly, I will explain to you that the Volk and Nazis were anti-Christian and second, to find a solution for the Holocaust helps to forgive white people (through getting non-white people to forgive us and admire us) and therefore, it actually does something for Christianity. Therefore, my saving grace in studying and presenting my thoughts on the origins and causes of the Holocaust, is that I offer a solution called the Ismlessism. The question is, does the Holocaust need fixing? I believe it definitely does and I believe the only way to fix the Holocaust is through having 0 isms and the Ismlessism.
Prior to Nazi anti-Semitism and anti-Christianity many German intellectuals and professors, such as Richard Wagner and philosophers such as Friedrich Nietzsche fought an intellectual and cultural warfare against the spiritual influence of the Christianity over the world and also against the domination of Jewish culture over German arts and culture. In fact, Friedrich Nietzsche was a disciple of Richard Wagner and Nietzsche was in what was known as the ‘Wagnerian circle’. Richard Wagner had a great cultural enterprise or mission for Germany, which envisioned a tremendous cultural rebirth of Germanic arts and culture with an eternal battle against the influence of inferior Jewish culture. Wagner was an influence on the younger Nietzsche. This inordinate spiritual influence of Christianity over the world is what the Volk or Nazis and Volkish intellectuals and scholars, such as Richard Wagner and Friedrich Nietzsch did not like. The reason I am telling this to you, is that such virulent nineteenth century intellectual, spiritual and cultural anti-Christianity, expressed particularly through anti-Semitism in Germany, was a precursor to violent Nazi anti-Semitism and anti-Christianity. I will tell you that the Volk (or Germans) but especially the Nazis were to this end not just anti-Semitic, but they were spiritually anti-Christian and symbolically through the Holocaust the Nazis tried to eradicate the inordinate spiritual influence of Christianity from existence. The Jews or Israelites took the brunt of this German or Volkish spiritual anti-Christianity, however, we all as devout Protestants would also have suffered and been oppressed.
Significant in this episode, however, is not the mistaken facts, but the readiness of the young academic Wagnerians to conceive any opposition as part of a cultural war between urban, sophistic, journalistic Jews and noble, stalwart, superior Germans.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, Robert C. Holub, page 81.
In the anti-Jewish mentality of the late nineteenth century, journalism was the special province of the Jews. Among Judeophobes they were regarded as the owners of the major newspapers and journalistic organs, and the newspaper or magazine article, with its quick and mass appeal, its flashy and insubstantial language, and its superficial display of learning and virtuosity, became the paradigm for Jewish culture, which was antithetical to everything truly profound, serious, genial, and German.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, Robert C. Holub, page 83.
In these lectures we once again encounter the familiar antithesis of the Wagnerian cultural project: a German realm of true artistry and genius opposed to, and at present thwarted by, a Jewish-dominated culture of journalism and kitsch.
Nietzsche was learning well how to vent his frustration at modern Jewry and its tyranny over German culture without specific references to Jews.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, Robert C. Holub, page 84.
In the Untimely Meditations the understood background to the ills of modernity remains the Jews and their inordinate influence over German culture.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, Robert C. Holub, page 169.
Nietzsche, the opponent of political anti-Semitism in his own era, infuses his text with another motif from his adversaries by proclaiming, as Wagner had done in his “Judaism and Music” and Marr had claimed in his Victory of Judaism over Germanness (1879), the ultimate victory of Jewry over peoples closely resembling Germans.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, Robert C. Holub, page 87.
Related to Friedrich Nietzsche, I have read the following books:
- The Philosophy and Psychology of Hitler and Nietzsche, by Tim Ouellette.
- Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, (A selection of Friedrich Nietzsche writings, compiled by multiple authors).
- Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, by Robert C. Holub.
- Twilight of Idols and Anti-Christ, by Friedrich Nietzsche.
- On the Genealogy of Morals, by Friedrich Nietzsche.
- Beyond Good And Evil, by Friedrich Nietzsche.
This is in an effort to understand how and why the Nazis the inverse of Christian sympathy and compassion and hence to understand the intellectual origins of the Holocaust. I am trying to understand the German ideologies and philosophies which influenced the German mentality and which geared them up for total war and the Holocaust in the early 20th century. The Indian religion Jainism is about extreme nonviolence, in that, Jainists believe that everything has a soul, even plants, and so Jainists won’t even eat root vegetables as that would kill the entire plant. Therefore, Jainists only pick and eat the fruit from plants. Jainists believe killing things, even plants leads to bad karma and that nonviolence is the path to enlightenment. Now as I will show you, unlike Indians, Europeans feel that they have something to defend, which instinctively gives the Europeans a more antithetical and more aggressive philosophy or point of view to such as the nonviolent Jainists. However, I will demonstrate to you that the Volk were anti-Christian and therefore, they did not have a fundamental, peaceful, nonviolent and religious ism of their own. However, the fundamental, literally universal and 0% biased religion of Ismlessism is peaceful and nonviolent and it may give to Europeans something similar to Christianity and what they lacked during the Holocaust. It is almost a tug of philosophical war between peaceful and nonviolent East (such as India and China) versus the belligerent West (such as Germany). The two world wars and the Holocaust end the debate, in that fundamental, peaceful and nonviolent philosophies and religions are unquestionably right.
…the ideas of the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, ideas that have spawned horrific ideologies and have proffered a distorted view of the mind, the will, and human nature.
The Philosophy and Psychology of Hitler and Nietzsche, by Tim Ouellette, location 34.
Bismarck sought to retain authority, not by votes, “but by blood and iron” and “This was the Germany which Hitler resolved to restore.”
“Bismarck’s unique creation is the Germany we have known in our time, a problem child of Europe and the world for nearly a century, a nation of gifted, vigorous people in which first this remarkable man and then Kaiser Wilhelm II and finally Hitler, aided by a military caste and by many a strange intellectual, succeeded in inculcating a lust for power and domination, a passion for unbridled militarism, a contempt for democracy and individual freedom and a longing for authority, for authoritarianism…”
Friedrich Nietzsche was one of those many ‘strange intellectuals’ that succeeded in inculcating in the German people a lust for power and domination, a passion for unbridled militarism, a contempt for democracy and individual freedom and a longing for authority, for authoritarianism…
The Philosophy and Psychology of Hitler and Nietzsche, by Tim Ouellette, location 94.
Democratism has always been the décadence type of organizing power…
Democracy is the natural consequence of Christianity.
Europe is a collapsing world. Democracy is the decaying form of the state.
European democracy is, to the smallest degree, the unleashing of forces. Above all, it is an unleashing of laziness, weariness, weakness.
Disregard for, along with the decline and death of the state, the unleashing of the private person … is the consequence of the conceptualized democratic state…
Liberal institutions immediately cease to be liberal, as soon as they are attained; afterwards, there are no more mischievous or more radical enemies of freedom than liberal institutions. One knows well enough what they accomplish: they undermine the will to power, they are the levelling of mountain and valley exalted into morality, they make people small, cowardly, and voluptuous, – with them the herding animal always triumphs. Liberalism: that is increased herding-animality.
Democracy represents the disbelief in great men and elite society: “One man is equal to the next.” “Fundamentally we are all self-serving cattle and rabble.”
Equal justice for all – that is the outstanding injustice; for the highest men arrive too soon.
The doctrine of equality! … But there exists no deadlier poison; for it seems to be preached by justice itself, while it does away with justice…
Difference prevails among the smallest of things, such as sperm, and eggs – equality is an extraordinary delusion.
The Press. Let us consider how, even today, all great political events sneak silently behind the curtain, how they are concealed by trivial events and appear minor next to them, how it is long after they have occurred that their dire effects are felt as the ground shakes – with the press as it now is, with its daily wave of hot air spreading dread, exclaiming, inciting, alarming, what meaning can we now give it – is it something more than a perpetual false alarm that leads the ears and senses down the wrong path?
We now face the repercussions of the “great” happenings – the repercussions of the press.
The freedom of the press ruins style, and ultimately spirit.
I am against parliamentarianism and the press, for they are the means with which the herd animal believes it turns itself into a god.
Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, location 979 – 1020.
Let this “Sword of the Spirit” accompany the German warriors and soldiers as they help build a new Europe upon the ruins of an old world, and who keenly understand the truth of Nietzsche’s words which conclude the following selection:
Brethren, war’s the origin
Of happiness on earth!
Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, location 60.
One has renounced grand life when one renounces war.…
Twilight of Idols and Anti-Christ, Friedrich Nietzsche, page 53.
The Ismlessism eradicates the world’s worst ism, namely racism. As you will see it is evident that right-wing, proto-fascist, anti-Christian 19th century-German philosophies such as Nietzscheanism culminated in the 20th century to produce racism. My purpose is to compare German philosophies such as Nietzscheanism with Christianity. One thing that I have realised about philosophy as opposed to religion, is that some philosophies are complex, advanced and highly articulate, however, these kind of philosophies are abstruse, in that they are not easily grasped. For example, Friedrich Nietzsche’s vocabulary is astounding, he dances with words and I love his literature, in that the language is so fascinating and educational in its contemporary context. However, such expert use of vocabulary makes Nietzsche quite abstruse and does not initially or easily allow us to grasp him. It is only by completing one of Nietzsche’s books and by doing follow-up research on Wikipedia, does one gather a deep understanding of Nietzsche, but initially it’s quite hard to understand. Another example is such as Aristotle’s Nichomachean Ethics and Metaphysics which are articulate and abstruse, and therefore, are difficult for neophytes, tyros and amateur humanists. For example, Ibn Sina read Aristotle’s Metaphysics 40 times before abandoning it as incomprehensible. In the same way Friedrich Nietzsche has such a treasury of vocabulary, that as a humanist like me, it is hard to initially grasp him. Unlike religions, Nietzsche is inaccessible to children. Ismlessism is a fundamental, universal and 0% biased religion, but it is actually as simple and plain as the nativity. Philosophy is powerful because it influences politicians who in turn influence all of our minds. However, anti-Christian Nietzsche may have influenced political leaders in an incorrect way. The Ismlessism is very simple, direct, and makes complete and instant sense to people. There is sometimes not much difference between religion and philosophy, however, religion (especially scripture) is never advanced or abstruse and never uses highly articulate language. Religion is for example as simple as the moral of the nativity, which even children can understand. Religions want us to understand them as easily as possible. Philosophy may be inverse to religion in that philosophy is as articulate as it possibly can be to communicate an overall meaning, while religion is as accessible as it possibly can be to communicate its simplicity. I believe that religion is deliberately as simple as it possibly can be because it knows that it has something real. Whereas philosophy is as articulate as it possibly can be because it knows it doesn’t. You must understand that the Ismlessism is not better than Nietzscheanism, it is simply different in an good hearted way, and perhaps it is what is required for the Holocaust?
At that time Jesus said, “I praise you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because you have hidden these things from the wise and learned, and revealed them to little children.”
Religion is simple, in that all ages from 4 year olds to centenarians can understand the nativity, which is down to earth. This is why religion, such as Christianity is right and why philosophy (such as Nietzsche’s anti-Semitic and anti-Christian philosophy) can be misunderstood. Philosophy can sometimes for all intents and purposes be bad compared to religions, because articulate 19th century philosophies such as Nietzscheanism influenced German ultranationalism, two European world wars and the Holocaust. The Holocaust came about due to such as Richard Wagner’s nineteenth century cultural war against Judaism and the prevalence of anti-Semitic and anti-Christian philosophies and literature in Germany, and the deficiency of religious isms (unlike Asia) in Germany and Europe. Friedrich Nietzsche talks frequently of the noble and warrior-like Greco-Roman culture and rebukes the Christians for their charity, weakness, compassion or what he calls their ‘inversion of valuations’. Therefore, analogously, the Holocaust represents a battle or tug of war between Greco-Roman (European) science and philosophy and Israelite (non-European) religion. Obviously the Germans wanted “superior” European culture, science and philosophy to defeat “inferior” Jewish spiritual influence.
This is why the Greeks remain the supreme cultural event of history – they knew, they did what needed to be done; Christianity, which despised the body, has up till now been mankind’s greatest misfortune. –
Twilight of Idols and Anti-Christ, Friedrich Nietzsche, page 112.
Therefore, the Ismlessism is also the battle between noble and warrior-like Greco-Roman (European) culture and philosophy against Christian (non-European) religion and influence, only that the Ismlessism wants Christianity. Philosophies such as Nietzscheanism are as articulate as they can be to communicate their overall meaning but they are abstruse, and can therefore, only really be understood by university students. From my reading Nietzschean philosophy, as a humanist, I can’t help feeling that I am simple. However, that is entirely the point of religions, because it doesn’t matter if you are simple or intelligent, as you can be a good layperson or an evil genius (such as Nietzsche). This might explain why the Nazis were evil because they and Germany were influenced by such anti-Semitic and anti-Christian German philosophers and scholars as Friedrich Nietzsche. Simple is exactly what religions are. Therefore, the bottom line is that most philosophies try to be highly advanced and articulate, while religion tries to be as simple and as possible. Is this why when we say something is philosophical it can mean that something is not real? However, the Ismlessism proves that philosophy and religion are every bit as important as science, as science is neutral and amoral, science hasn’t got a soul and will therefore, never forgive us for sins such as the Holocaust. The Holocaust requires a religious solution. Philosophy is ineffably powerful because it influences governments, political leaders and revolutionaries (such as Lenin and Stalin) which in turn influence the world. However, because philosophy influences top-level governments and politics, it therefore, must always be just and humanitarian. For example, Moses commanded the Israelites to obey the Lord’s statutes, laws and ordinances which shows that leaders have always instinctively implemented and instituted morality and justice. The Nazis legalised crime, murder and instituted evil. I believe that German philosophers such as Friedrich Nietzsche who also got to influence, were also not entirely good hearted but were right-wing, atheistic, anti-Semitic, anti-Christian, proto-fascist and militaristic. Therefore, what I am demonstrating to you is that such anti-Semitic, anti-Christian and articulate 19th century philosophies, such as Nietzscheanism were responsible for 19th century and 20th century German ultranationalism, anti-Semitism and the Holocaust. I am trying to prove to you that the reason that the Holocaust happened and why the Nazis were so evil and why they were so diametrically inverse to sympathy and compassion was because they were anti-Christian. It was the Nazis’ (and the Volk’s) faith in science such as Darwinism that caused the Holocaust. Fundamentally it was because they were anti-Christian. Although related, I believe it was primarily the Christian question, not only the Jewish question which produced the Holocaust. To be anti-Christian is to be opposite to goodness. It’s kind of difficult to describe Nietzsche as good or bad, he is an excellent writer and his command of language and vocabulary is outstanding. Therefore, Nietzsche was an expert writer, however, good is an ambiguous term, I mean Nietzsche hated Christianity. Therefore, Nietzsche was an excellent philosopher but an hard philosopher. Nietzsche questioned Christianity intellectually and philosophically, he wanted to break Christianity, he did make a breakthrough and made it possible and even right to be atheist, which is the root or cause of why the Nazis were so evil and diametrically inverse to the of Christianity. The Holocaust happened not just because of the Jewish question, I believe it happened also because of the Christian question, which no one asked more than Nietzsche (followed by the Nazis). One lesson from the Holocaust is to never ever question the Christianity. Therefore, articulate, anti-Semitic and anti-Christian philosophies such as Nietzscheanism helped make the Nazis evil. Therefore, apart from Christianity, did 19th and 20th century Germans (unlike the Asians) have some kind of a deficiency of good hearted, peaceful and nonviolent religious isms of their own? You can’t have the desire to conquer the world and have a good heart at the same time, and this is why Germany collectively and instinctively created anti-Semitic, anti-Christian philosophies and ideologies, as well as ultranationalism, fascism and militarism. Religion such as Christianity does not care about science, even if religion is inaccurate compared to science. Why is it that philosophy can be criticised by science; however, science can never really criticise or overcome religion? Is philosophy is not spiritual? Is this why philosophers try to be so advanced?
Because it is simple.
As I have stated philosophy is inverse to religion because philosophy such as Nietzscheanism tries as hard as it can to be as advanced, complicated and articulate as it can, while religion tries as hard as it can to be as simple as it can. For example, as you will see later the single most important idea or practice of the Ismlessism is that we nothing beings do things for nothing or for free of charge, the afterlife, spirits, space and for the Literally Universal God (LUG) (nothing and everything). We do this because we nothing beings believe everything should be free. We nothing beings believe in that everything is in nothing. For example, most importantly charity, giving or sharing and fundamental prayer is done for nothing. We nothing beings believe that like the Buddha and Jesus Christ who were so humble that they made themselves nothing and less than nothing (yet everything), that similarly, doing things for zero profit, £0s and loss is to do something for the Literally Universal God (LUG) who is nothing and everything. Therefore, the Ismlessism being a religion tries as hard as it can to get this message of doing things for nothing as simple as possible. Hence, the Ismlessism simplifies the concept of doing things for nothing into a hand sign that you can gesture with one hand, therefore, ‘For Nothing’ becomes ‘4-0’.
All religions deliberately never get any more advanced than this because unlike philosophy, religions know they have something real. This is the whole point of religion. Spirits are nothing and doing things for nothing is spiritual. The Ismlessism is an advanced religion for a technological age because it is deliberately simple. All the way through developing this essay I have focused on the Christianity which is inverse and simple. I have practiced many inverse practices and focused on the low, the simple and the thick nature of faith. I have constantly reiterated the fact that simple and thick faith, charity and piety etc are better than high, advanced and intelligent science and academia which in can sometimes be bad. The Ismlessism is just 2 numbers 0 and ∞ which never divide, multiply or perform any advanced arithmetic, trigonometry or calculus etc. Therefore, the Ismlessism is advanced religion because it is simple.
What led the Nazis down the 180° diametrically opposite or inverse direction to Christianity?
As I have demonstrated by advanced philosophy and simple religion, I believe that the west or western science (as demonstrated by Friedrich Nietzsche and Charles Darwin) has or had too many intellectual freedoms in the 19th century to intellectually attack the religion itself or Christianity because all religions are deliberately low, simple and imprecise (compared to advanced philosophy and science). The west or western science believes that if they had no option but to be strictly or even violently religious (or Christian) that they would not be able to be advanced. This view of western science may have fundamentally pointed the Nazis in the 180° diametrically opposite or inverse direction of Christianity and led them to the Holocaust. Besides the belief regarding religion is unfounded because it doesn’t matter if you are mandatorily forced to be religious as you can still be advanced. Hence, I aim to prove to you that simple, thick and imprecise religion (and religious practices such as prayer, charity and fasting for ‘nothing’ or for the afterlife, spirits, space and God) simply balances high and advanced science. As demonstrated by Friedrich Nietzsche and Charles Darwin, the Holocaust determines that there is simply a lesson regarding the dangers of unrestricted, unchecked intellectual freedom to attack fundamental religion and Christianity.
I will mention at this point that I do not want to portray a negative picture of Friedrich Nietzsche, as he wasn’t that bad. 95% of his writings are brilliant and he was against the anti-Semitic movement in Germany in the 1880s. Nietzsche was a good philosopher, it’s just that through his theories such as his ‘transvaluation of values’ (or his ‘inversion of valuations’) and his ‘master-slave morality’, he created an inverse philosophy and viewpoint to Christianity. His inversion of valuations inverted the Christianity and his master-slave morality helped the Nazis make masters of themselves and slaves out of the Jews or Israelites. I will warn you that I have only quoted from the remaining 5% of Nietzsche’s writings. I did this to portray a picture of Nietzsche, but it’s actually not an true picture. Like Charles Darwin, Friedrich Nietzsche is connected the Holocaust and is a good person.
What is good? – All that increases the feeling of power, the will to power, power itself, in man.
What is bad? – All that proceeds from weakness.
Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, location 1594.
The world is neither good nor evil! And so is it with man!
Verily, I say unto you: good and evil which would be everlasting – it doth not exist! Of its own accord must it ever surpass itself anew.
It requires minimal reflection in order to accept the idea that nothing is “good in itself,” that something good must be thought of only as “wherefore good,” by necessity, any good intentions will be viewed as “evil and bad” by opposing intentions: in short, every single thing to which we attribute the title “good,” can also be denoted as “evil.”
False shores and false securities did the good teach you; in the lies of the good were ye born and bred. Everything hath been radically contorted and distorted by the good.
Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, location 1647 – 1665.
To assert the Teutons were predetermined and conditioned for Christianity, there can be no greater impudence in such an assertion. If it is so, the antithesis is not only true, but also obvious. Wherefrom should the fabrication of Jesus and Saul, the two very Jewish Jews, who may or may not have existed, be more intimate with the Teutons than with other peoples?
A nihilistic religion like Christianity, old and rugged enough to have survived every strong instinct and accordingly sprung out of the people, transmitted itself step by step through other spheres of influence, finally within the youth, and even converted people yet to exist – very odd! An evening blessing including a shepherd and a grand conclusion preached to barbarians and Teutons! How all must be barbarized and Germanized! And in such a way, as those who dreamt of Valhalla know, that all the happiness on earth was found in war!
It hardly seems possible to transplant a foreign myth with continual success without irreparably damaging the tree via the transplant. Perhaps, in one case, it may be strong and healthy enough to eliminate this foreign element through a violent fight, however, it must consume itself sick and withered, or in diseased overgrowth. We think so highly of the pure and powerful core of German character that we dare to expect of it, above all others, the elimination of forcibly implanted foreign elements, and deem it possible that the German spirit will reclaim itself.
Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, location 444.
It might still be possible for the Germans to make an honorable name ultimately out of their old name of reproach, by becoming the first non-Christian nation of Europe; for which purpose Schopenhauer, to their honor, regarded them as highly qualified. The work of Luther would thus be consummated, – he who taught them to be anti-Roman, and to say: “Here I stand! I cannot do otherwise!”
I do not understand how a German could ever feel Christian…
Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, location 584.
The dangers of the Jewish soul are:
- They gleefully create parasitic settlements.
- They know how to “adapt,” as the naturalists say: through which they have become born actors, like the polyps about which Theognis sang, as they camouflage themselves the color of the cliffs to which they cling.
Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, location 674 – 699.
That Germany has amply sufficient Jews, that the German stomach, the German blood, has difficulty (and will long have difficulty) in disposing only of this quantity of “Jew” – as the Italian, the Frenchman, and the Englishman have done by means of a stronger digestion: – that is the unmistakable declaration and language of a general instinct, to which one must listen and according to which one must act. “Let no more Jews come in! And shut the doors, especially towards the East (also towards Austria)!” – thus commands the instinct of a people whose nature is still feeble and uncertain, so that it could be easily wiped out, easily extinguished, by a stronger race.
A thinker who has the future of Europe at heart, will, in all his perspectives concerning the future, calculate upon the Jews, as he will calculate upon the Russians, as above all the surest and likeliest factors in the great play and battle of forces.
Amid the dramas to which the upcoming century invites us, one is the decision regarding the destiny of the European Jews. The fact that their die is cast and they have crossed the point of no return is now tangibly obvious: all that is left for them is to either become the masters of Europe or to lose Europe as they lost Egypt long ago, where they placed themselves between a similar either-or.
Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, location 718.
Man shall be trained for war, and woman for the recreation of the warrior: all else is folly.
Thus would I have man and woman: fit for war, the one; fit for maternity, the other; both, however, fit for dancing with head and legs.
Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, location 1691 – 1706.
Exceptional individual men should have the chance to procreate with more than one woman; and individual women, especially those with favorable qualities, should likewise not remain bound to the fate of one man.
Let us be against the ill gotten as we are against criminals: also, let us detest their propagation. This is the first general improvement of custom I desire: it should not be acceptable for the criminals and the ill gotten to propagate.
Another commandment of philanthropy. There are cases where to have a child would be a crime – for example, for chronic invalids and extreme neurasthenics. … Lastly, society here has a positive duty to fulfill, and of all the demands that are made on it, there are few more urgent and necessary than this one. Society, as the trustee of life, is responsible for every botched life before it comes into existence, and as it has to atone for such lives, it ought consequently to make it impossible for them ever to see the light of day: it should in many cases actually prevent the act of procreation, and may, without any regard for rank, descent, or intellect, hold in readiness the most rigorous forms of compulsion and restriction, and, under certain circumstances, have recourse to castration. The Mosaic law, “Thou shalt do no murder,” is a piece of ingenuous puerility compared with the earnestness of this forbidding of life to decadents, “Thou shalt not beget!!!” … For life itself recognizes no solidarity or equality of rights between the healthy and unhealthy parts of an organism. The latter must at all cost be eliminated, lest the whole fall to pieces.
The new problem: whether or not a few people can rise to become a better race at the cost of others. Reproduction…
My philosophy reveals the triumphant thought through which all other systems of thought must ultimately perish. It is the great disciplinary thought: those races that cannot bear it are doomed; those which regard it as the greatest blessing are destined to rule.
The strong of the future. To what extent necessity on the one hand and accident on the other have attained to conditions from which a stronger species may be reared: this we are now able to understand and to bring about consciously; we can now create those conditions under which such an elevation is possible.
Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, location 1774 – 1806.
In the initial year of National Socialist rule, Gottlieb Scheffler categorizes Nietzsche accordingly as a “theoretical anti-Semite,” who grounded his anti-Christianity on anti-Semitism.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, Robert C. Holub, page 14.
As an example of nineteenth and early twentieth century German philosophers, writers, scholars and publishers Nietzsche was sometimes anti-Semitic and disliked Christianity, which obviously and necessarily will only lead to evil. Nietzsche’s anti-Semitism was contradictory, sometimes he expressed admiration for the Jews and Jewish virtues at other times he harboured anti-Semitic expressions and feelings, especially in his notebooks and correspondence. During his years as a Wagnerian disciple he was likely anti-Semitic, however, after his break up with Wagner and at the same time as the rise of the anti-Semitic political movement in Germany in the 1880s, Nietzsche rejected anti-Semitism, although for different reasons as to one in the twenty first century might expect. In historical context Nietzsche was against the anti-Semitic movement in Germany in the 1880s, as it was immoderate and distasteful, however, he sometimes made anti-Jewish remarks and statements, particularly in his notebooks and correspondence, but sometimes in his published works that we today in the twenty first century would consider anti-Semitic. However, what I am trying to prove to you is that it is not just anti-Semitism but anti-Christianity is evil, and that it was Nietzsche’s Christian question and his philosophical attack on the inordinate spiritual influence of the Christianity which influenced militarism, xenophobia and ultranationalism. Because Nietzsche attacked Christianity in the last quarter of the nineteenth century he normalised anti-Christianity, his inverse of valuations inverted the Christianity and his master-slave morality enabled the Nazis to make masters out of themselves and slaves out of the Jews or Israelites. Unrestricted and unchecked science such as Darwinism and philosophy such as Nietzscheanism fundamentally pointed the Nazis in the 180° diametrically opposite or inverse direction of the Christianity and led them to the Holocaust. By the time of Nazism, German anti-Christianity had a Volkish heritage, tradition and authority (backed up by Friedrich Nietzsche).
Nietzsche’s response to and rejection of anti-Semitism, viewed from the perspective of the 1880s, is part and parcel of his assault on Christian ethics, narrow-minded nationalism, and redemptive socialism. It does not arise from philo-Semitic sentiments and is unrelated to the liberalism we normally identify with attitudes opposed to racism and supportive of civil liberties in an egalitarian society.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, Robert C. Holub, page 131.
We will recall that in aphorism 205, titled “Of the People of Israel,” Nietzsche expresses an admiration for Jewry in persevering for so many centuries under persecution, and that he attributes their current characteristics, most of them laudable, to this long history of oppression. He also hopes that intermarriage with the noble classes of Europe will gradually remove any unfavorable character traits.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, Robert C. Holub, page 155.
What was new for Nietzsche and antithetical to his former Wagnerian perspective was the celebration of Jewish hegemony in Europe. The solution to the Jewish Question is not assimilation—although there is some suggestion of intermarriage with the upper classes—or the gradual disappearance of Jewish vices in favor of their virtues. Rather, at least in Dawn, the dilemma of Jewish existence in a hostile Europe will be resolved by Jewish dominance over the continent.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, Robert C. Holub, page 120.
Regardless, this kind of anti-Semitic and anti-Christian German philosophy shown above is partly responsible for why Germany and Nazism tried to uproot the Judaism and Christianity (for a start) from Europe in the twentieth century via the Holocaust. Because science such as Darwinism and philosophy such as Nietzscheanism (and their scepticism of Abrahamic religions) fundamentally pointed the Nazis in the 180° diametrically opposite or inverse direction of Christianity, I am therefore, trying to re-inverse that 180° diametrically opposite or inverse scientific and philosophical direction of the Nazis and Nietzsche.
It was evident to all commentators that Nietzsche had championed war, battle, agon, struggle, and related notions repeatedly in his writings. While many interpreters simply considered statements concerning these terms part of a metaphorical register unrelated to actual military conflict, World War I began a longer association of Nietzsche and the goals of German militaristic and right-wing segments of society who were ultrapatriotic and at the same time xenophobic.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, Robert C. Holub, page ,.
Philosophy influences governments and politics (as demonstrated by Lenin and Stalin), which means it therefore, must always be fair. Only the Nazis who got to the top-level of national government, legalised criminality and instituted evil. Therefore, philosophers should always be just and fair. Therefore, as you will see later, as a fundamental, universal and 0% biased religion, the Ismlessism is very good hearted, benevolent, unbiased, neutral and fair. The Ismlessism is good hearted. Again you may say that I am simple by having to read a whole book of Nietzsche’s and then research it on Wikipedia, to grasp Nietzsche? Nietzsche has an amazing vocabulary, he is articulate and highly intellectual, however, I believe religions such as Christianity and the Ismlessism are actually a little anti-academic or anti-intellectual because they are and have to be accessible and easily understood by infants. Religions are deliberately simple. And it is precisely because religions are simple, down to earth and understandable to children, that makes them so well. Although a fundamental, universal and 0% biased religion of its own, the Ismlessism is also very well in its goals and practices, which come from Christianity and Buddhism. Therefore, advanced philosophy such as Nietzsche’s vocabulary and his anti-Christian ideas contributed to the German mindset, soul and consciousness in the late 19th and early 20th centuries; and therefore, created German ultranationalism, militarism and the Holocaust. The Ismlessism might highlight to philosophers the inverse difference between philosophy and religion, in that philosophy is complicated while religion is deliberately simple. Again because advanced and science such as Darwinism and advanced philosophy such as Nietzscheanism (and their scepticism of deliberately low religions) fundamentally led the Nazis in the 180° diametrically opposite or inverse direction of Christian simpathy and towards the Holocaust; I am therefore, trying to re-inverse advanced science and philosophy by 180°.
Darwinism and Nietzsche.
Christianity is supernatural while Darwinism is natural, and I will demonstrate it to you. Christianity is not conceited and it is compassionate and charitable while Darwinism doesn’t care about the ‘poor’, ‘sick’ and ‘injured’. For example, a hominin could be superior, however, if he broke a leg, he would need an ‘inferior’ or a ‘weaker’ hominin to nurse him or her. This is supernatural and it only applies to human beings. As animals if you are ‘weak’, ‘sick’ or ‘injured’ then tough, you are on your own and will likely end up the meal of a predator. The Literally Universal God (LUG) has seen 4 billion years of evolution and absolutely nothing else; therefore, the Literally Universal God (LUG) looks for and cares about such as the Christianity’s inverse nature (or Friedrich Nietzsche’s ‘inversion of values’) such as Christian compassion, pity and charity; because these qualities are what separate sentient beings from the animals. This is what the Nazis did, they inverted the Christianity, made ‘slaves’ out of the Israelites and applied the laws of nature to humanity and to society, in that they culled off and exterminated those they considered ‘inferior’, ‘weak’ or ‘sick’ to protect the Aryan ‘master’ race from genetic contamination. They believed in the survival of the fittest theory. However, they simply applied the laws of nature or animals to humanity. The Nazis and the Volk had a diametrically inverse belief system to Christianity, they did not believe in the Christianity and Jesus Christ, they believed in Charles Darwin, science and nature instead. I will try to demonstrate to you that unchecked faith in science over religion only leads to disaster and this is what may have fundamentally led the Nazis in the 180° diametrically opposite or inverse direction of Christianity and towards the Holocaust. Having unquestionable faith in science and ‘nothing’ else such as fundamental religion only leads to disaster. Until now I have not attacked Charles Darwin (as I have done with Friedrich Nietzsche), but even more responsibility for the Holocaust can be attributed to Darwinism. Friedrich Nietzsche was philosophical, whereas Charles Darwin was theoretical. As you will see the Nazis were influenced by Darwinism, in that they believed in science, natural selection and survival of the fittest theory, which are inverse to the Christian pity and compassion for the poor, the sick, the disabled and the injured. There is a lesson regarding unrestricted and unchecked devotion to philosophy such as Nietzscheanism and theories such as Darwinism and the subsequent rejection of or the disbelief in religion such as Christianity. There may be just a lesson regarding unrestrained and unchecked faith in science and the questioning and rejection of the divine.
Darwin added that by applying his survival of the fittest theory, the eventual result of the differences between the races was that “the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace throughout the world the savage races.”
Regarding the above quotation of Charles Darwin, don’t you believe that it is entirely ironic that as a result of Britain, it is actually and (in a 180° diametrically opposite or inverse direction way) inversely the so called ‘civilised’ European races that are certainly being exterminated and replaced throughout the world by the so called ‘savage’ races? This is inverse and it is an obvious consequence of stopping the Holocaust. This inverse is obvious to Europeans and we should all admit it whether we want to or not.
Darwin “clung to the idea that the human races were distinctly different and basically unchangeable.” Furthermore, “according to Charles Darwin, the ‘strong’ were bound to be victorious, and the ‘weak’ to perish.”
“In nature there is no pity for the lesser creatures when they are destroyed so that the fittest may survive….”
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 388
The major opposition to Hitler’s policies was Christianity, of which a central doctrine was the need to help the disenfranchised, the poor, the deformed, the handicapped and the mentally ill, all of those that the Nazi leaders wanted to eradicate.
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 427
Nietzscheanism and Darwinism as applied by the Nazis and the Volk, that is, Nietzscheanism and Darwinism applied to the human race is the diametrical antithesis or the 180° diametrically opposite or inverse direction to Christianity and it’s inverse supernatural nature or what Friedrich Nietzsche called the Israelite’s and Christian’s so called ‘inversion of valuations.’ I will here explain Nietzsche’s inverse of valuations and master-slave morality, however, please try to bare in mind while you read the quotes that Ismless + ism is the mathematical perfection of the Protestantism and separation from regional religions, from monotheism to 0theism (1 to 0 and ∞).
The revaluation of all values or transvaluation of all values is a concept from the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche. Elaborating the concept in The Antichrist, Nietzsche asserts that Christianity, not merely as a religion but also as the predominant moral system of the Western world, inverts nature, and is “hostile to life”. As “the religion of pity”, it elevates the weak over the strong, exalting that which is “ill-constituted and weak” at the expense of that which is full of life and vitality.
Master–slave morality is a central theme of Friedrich Nietzsche’s works, particularly in the first essay of his book On the Genealogy of Morality. Nietzsche argues that there are two fundamental types of morality: “master morality” and “slave morality”. Master morality values pride and power, while slave morality values kindness, empathy, and sympathy.
As master morality originates in the strong, slave morality originates in the weak. Because slave morality is a reaction to oppression, it vilifies its oppressors. Slave morality is the inverse of master morality.
Slave morality does not aim at exerting one’s will by strength, but by careful subversion. It does not seek to transcend the masters, but to make them slaves as well. The essence of slave morality is utility: The good is what is most useful for the whole community, not just the strong.
Since the powerful are few compared to the masses of the weak, the weak gain power by corrupting the strong into believing that the causes of slavery (viz., the will to power) are evil, as are the qualities the weak originally could not choose because of their weakness.
By saying humility is voluntary, slave morality avoids admitting that their humility was in the beginning forced upon them by a master. Biblical principles of humility, charity, and pity are the result of universalizing the plight of the slave onto all humankind, and thus enslaving the masters as well. “The democratic movement is the heir to Christianity”—the political manifestation of slave morality because of its obsession with freedom and equality.
“…the Jews achieved that miracle of inversion of values thanks to which life on earth has for a couple millennia acquired a new and dangerous fascination – their prophets fused “rich”, “godless”, “evil”, “violent”, “sensual” into one, and were the first to coin the word “world” as a term of infamy. It is this inversion of values (with which is involved the employment of the word for “poor” as a synonym for “holy” and “friend”) that the significance of the Jewish people resides: With them, there begins the slave revolt in morals.”
He [Nietzsche] noted that ancient Greek and Roman societies were grounded in master morality. The Homeric hero is the strong-willed man, and the classical roots of the Iliad and Odyssey exemplified Nietzsche’s master morality. He calls the heroes “men of a noble culture”, giving a substantive example of master morality. Historically, master morality was defeated, as Christianity’s slave morality spread throughout the Roman Empire.
The struggle between the polytheistic culture of the Rome (master, strong) and newly developed Christian monotheism in former Judea and surrounding territories in the Middle East (slave, weak) lasted continuously until 323, when Christianity became the Roman Empire’s official religion.
Nietzsche condemns the triumph of slave morality in the West, saying that the democratic movement is the “collective degeneration of man”. He claims that the nascent democratic movement of his time was essentially slavish and weak. Weakness conquered strength, slave conquered master, re-sentiment conquered sentiment. This ressentiment Nietzsche calls “priestly vindictiveness”, based on the jealous weak seeking to enslave the strong and thus erode the basis for power by pulling the powerful down. Such movements were, according to Nietzsche, inspired by “the most intelligent revenge” of the weak. Nietzsche saw democracy and Christianity as the same emasculating impulse, which sought to make everyone equal by making everyone a slave.
In On the Genealogy of Morals, Nietzsche presents three treatises which trace episodes in the evolution of moral concepts with a view to confronting “moral prejudices”, specifically those of Christianity and Judaism. In the “First Treatise”, Nietzsche demonstrates that the two pairs of opposites “good/evil” and “good/bad” have very different origins, and that the word “good” itself came to represent two opposed meanings. In the “good/bad” distinction of the aristocratic way of thinking, “good” is synonymous with nobility and everything which is powerful and life-asserting; in the “good/evil” distinction, which Nietzsche calls “slave morality”, the meaning of “good” is made the inverse of the original aristocratic “good”, which itself is re-labelled “evil”. This inversion of values develops out of the ressentiment felt by the weak towards the powerful. From the aristocratic mode of valuation, another mode of valuation branches off, which develops into its opposite: the priestly mode. Nietzsche proposes that longstanding confrontation between the priestly caste and the warrior caste fuels this splitting of meaning. The priests, and all those who feel disenfranchised and powerless in a lowly state of subjugation and physical impotence (e.g., slavery), develop a deep and venomous hatred for the powerful. Thus originates what Nietzsche calls the “slave revolt in morality”, which, according to him, begins with Judaism, for it is the bridge that led to the slave revolt, via Christian morality, of the alienated, oppressed masses of the Roman Empire (a dominant theme in The Antichrist, written the following year). Nietzsche concludes his First Treatise by hypothesising a tremendous historical struggle between the Roman dualism of “good/bad” and that of the Judaic “good/evil”, with the latter eventually achieving a victory for ressentiment, broken temporarily by the Renaissance, but then reasserted by the Reformation, and finally confirmed by the French Revolution when the “ressentiment instincts of the rabble” triumphed.
The Nazis were against the inordinate spiritual influence of the Christianity as demonstrated by European Christian names, and I understand Nietzsche as well. Nietzsche was elitist and bellicose, he advocated the strong, the powerful and the aristocratic, like the ancient Greeks and Romans while he disliked the weak, the priestly, the masses, the poor, the compassionate, the pitying and the rabble, such as the ancients Israelites and the early Christians. Nietzsche and the Volk tried to inverse or eradicate the the inordinate spiritual influence of the Christianity which is demonstrated by Christian names.
I will repeat what Nietzsche said:
The Jews – a people “born for slavery,” as Tacitus and the whole ancient world say of them; “the chosen people among the nations,” as they themselves say and believe – the Jews performed the miracle of the inversion of valuations, by means of which life on earth obtained a new and dangerous charm for a couple of millenniums. Their prophets fused into one the expressions “rich,” “godless,” “wicked,” “violent,” “sensual,” and for the first time coined the word “world” as a term of reproach. In this inversion of valuations (in which is also included the use of the word “poor” as synonymous with “saint” and “friend”) the significance of the Jewish people is to be found; it is with them that the slave-insurrection in morals commences.
Nietzsche’s discussion of Christianity in section eight supplies further evidence that he conceives of the “slave revolt” in morals as primarily an instrument for Jewish domination, and that Christianity is a mere vehicle for this vengeful, decadent, Jewish activity.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, by Robert C. Holub, page 169.
The advent of Christ and of the Christian Church is in reality an invention of Jewish interests bent on extracting revenge on their enemies and ultimately conquering the world under the repressive and life-negating regime of slave morality.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, by Robert C. Holub, page 171.
All the world’s efforts against the “aristocrats,” the “mighty,” the “masters,” the “holders of power,” are negligible by comparison with what has been accomplished against those classes by the Jews – the Jews, that priestly nation which eventually realized that the one method of effecting satisfaction on its enemies and tyrants was by means of a radical transvaluation of values, which was at the same time an act of the cleverest revenge. Yet the method was only appropriate to a nation of priests, to a nation of the most jealously nursed priestly revengefulness. It was the Jews who, in opposition to the aristocratic equation (good = aristocratic = beautiful = happy = loved by the gods), dared with a terrifying logic to suggest the contrary equation, and indeed to maintain with the teeth of the most profound hatred (the hatred of weakness) this contrary equation, namely, “the wretched are alone the good; the poor, the weak, the lowly, are alone the good; the suffering, the needy, the sick, the loathsome, are the only ones who are pious, the only ones who are blessed, for them alone is salvation – but you, on the other hand, you aristocrats, you men of power, you are to all eternity the evil, the horrible, the covetous, the insatiate, the godless; eternally also shall you be the unblessed, the cursed, the damned!” We know who it was who reaped the heritage of this Jewish transvaluation.
Nietzsche demonstrates that he was 100% precisely and diametrically inverse to Christianity. This is because as you will see later, Christianity practices piety, selflessness and asceticism, and Christianity is also all about total selflessness and care towards the wretched, the poor, the weak, the lowly, the suffering, the needy, the sick and the loathsome, which, according to Jesus Christ, truly are the only ones who are pious, the only ones who are blessed and for them alone is Salvation. The following is The Beatitudes, which demonstrate the Christian inverse nature or what Friedrich Nietzsche called the Jewish and Christian ‘inversion of values’:
Now when Jesus saw the crowds, he went up on a mountainside and sat down. His disciples came to him, and he began to teach them.
“Blessed are the poor in spirit,
for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
Blessed are those who mourn,
for they will be comforted.
Blessed are the meek,
for they will inherit the earth.
Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness,
for they will be filled.
Blessed are the merciful,
for they will be shown mercy.
Blessed are the pure in heart,
for they will see God.
Blessed are the peacemakers,
for they will be called children of God.
Blessed are those who are persecuted because of righteousness,
for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
“Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of me. Rejoice and be glad, because great is your reward in heaven, for in the same way they persecuted the prophets who were before you.
The inverse nature of Christianity is also demonstrated by Romans 12:16:
Live in harmony with one another. Do not be proud, but be willing to associate with people of low position. Do not be conceited.
Christianity is inverse nature or what Nietzsche called the ‘inversion of valuations’ or the inversion of the Darwinian laws of nature. Friedrich Nietzsche is therefore, diametrically inverse to Christianity and this inverse nature and hence, Christianity and Nietzsche’s philosophy are inverse to each other. As demonstrated by Darwinism, Nietzsche and the Holocaust, if there had been less intellectual freedom to be irreligious or atheist in Europe during the 19th century, such as how medieval Europeans used to burn heretics at the stake then there would have been no Holocaust. By Nietzsche inventing the term inverse of valuations, he inverted Christianity and it’s supernatural mind.
In this initial mention of the Jews there are three features worth noting. First they are portrayed as aggressively opposing the value system that has subjugated them; Jews are directly antithetical to “aristocratic” social orders that Nietzsche has previously identified with the “master race,” with “Aryans,” and with blond and fair-haired peoples.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, by Robert C. Holub, page 168.
It is difficult to escape the conclusion that in the Genealogy Nietzsche sought to single out Jewry as such for promoting a life-negating, anti-Aryan, antiaristocratic value system that has gained world dominance.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, by Robert C. Holub, page 173.
Despite these concessions to the positive dimensions of slave morality and its Jewish propagators, the overall message of the initial essay in the Genealogy of Morals is Judeophobic. Rhetorically and substantively Nietzsche makes it clear that the introduction of “good and evil” has been detrimental to almost everything of value. He ultimately postulates an anti-Jewish historical trajectory that resembles anti-Semitic propaganda, but on a grander scale. Jewry displaces and defeats noble morality, associated with Aryans and fair-haired races, substituting for it life-negating and degenerate valuations, and, through deception or direct confrontation, manages well into the nineteenth century to retain its dominance over the peoples it has conquered.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, by Robert C. Holub, page 176.
This Jesus of Nazareth, the incarnate gospel of love, this “Redeemer” bringing salvation and victory to the poor, the sick, the sinful – was he not really temptation in its most sinister and irresistible form, temptation to take the tortuous path to those very Jewish values and those very Jewish ideals? Has not Israel really obtained the final goal of its sublime revenge, by the tortuous paths of this “Redeemer,” for all that he might pose as Israel’s adversary and Israel’s destroyer?
Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, location 674 – 699.
A woman who loves sacrifices her honour; a man of knowledge who ‘loves’ sacrifices perhaps his humanity; a god who loved became a Jew…
Twilight of Idols and Anti-Christ, Friedrich Nietzsche, page 110.
It is a dangerous gambit because of the enigma involved with having a God die such a gruesome death for the sake of humankind, out of love for his fellow human beings. But it is under this sign, Nietzsche writes, alluding to Constantine’s “in hoc signo vinces” (“in this sign you will conquer”), that Jewry celebrates its victory; in this radical reinterpretation of Christian iconography the cross symbolizes, not Christianity and the passion of Christ, but “Israel’s revenge and transvaluation of all values”, its defeat of all noble ideals.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, by Robert C. Holub, page 171.
“But you are finding this hard to follow? You have no eyes for something that took two thousand years to triumph?” We should not be deceived into thinking that Nietzsche’s use of the round number “two thousand” means that he is referring to Christianity alone.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, by Robert C. Holub, page 169.
Almost all commentators, however, eschew a close and accurate reading of Nietzsche’s provocative remarks in sections seven and eight of the Genealogy, where Nietzsche is making a claim for the significance of Jewry as the originator and propagator of the most debilitating moral system in human history. Nietzsche had already stated in Beyond Good and Evil that the “significance of the Jewish people” was that it inaugurated the slave revolt in morals, but in the Genealogy, which was composed specifically to clarify certain claims made in his earlier book, “Israel” is not only the inaugurator, but the clandestine power behind the transvaluation that Nietzsche deplores and that now dominates the modern world.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, by Robert C. Holub, page 172.
Nietzsche thus defines the greatest world-historical conflict as one between Romans and Jews, the former because they were “the strong and noble men, stronger and nobler than there had ever been on earth, or even dreamt of.” The Jews, for their part, are the archetypical “priestly people of ressentiment par excellence,” a people known for geniality in matters of slave morals. In case there is any question about who has been victorious in the epic battle of moral systems, Nietzsche informs his reader about the current state of affairs:
Which of these is in the ascendant at the moment, Rome or Judaea? But there is no room for doubt: consider before whom one bows today in Rome as before the epitome of all the highest values—and not only in Rome, but over almost half the world, wherever man has been tamed or wants to be tamed—before three Jews, as one knows, and one Jewess (before Jesus of Nazareth, the fisherman Peter, the carpet-maker Paul, and the mother of the aforementioned Jesus, Mary). This is most remarkable: there is no doubt that Rome has been defeated.
Nietzsche’s characterization of the most notable figures in Christianity as Jews is once again meant to emphasize the consistently Jewish nature of slave morality, and that Jewry, through Christianity, has come to dominate the Western world.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, by Robert C. Holub, page 174.
After Dühring, Nietzsche, in his turn combated Jewish and Christian ethics, which according to him are the ethics of slaves as contrasted with the ethics of masters. Through the prophets and Jesus, the Jews and the Christians have set up low and noxious conceptions which consist in the deification of the weak, the humble, the wretched, and sacrificing to it the strong, the proud, the mighty.
Nietzsche’s Jewish Problem: Between Anti-Semitism and Anti-Judaism, by Robert C. Holub, page 4.
The Darwinian theory of natural selection and the survival of the fittest is not for animals or the animal kingdom it is for humanity also, but there is nothing supernatural in the animal kingdom. To apply Darwinism to the human race without Christianity is to lower humanity to the level of nature. What Nietzsche is saying which is similar to the Darwinian theory, is that it is weak, wrong and ultimately rewardless to have pity for the weak, poor and ill-constituted etc. Here are some examples of the Jews’ and Christians’ inverse nature and the their ‘inversion of valuations’:
But he said to me, “My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness.” Therefore I will boast all the more gladly about my weaknesses, so that Christ’s power may rest on me.
That is why, for Christ’s sake, I delight in weaknesses, in insults, in hardships, in persecutions, in difficulties. For when I am weak, then I am strong.
2 Corinthians 12:9-10
But God chose the foolish things of the world to shame the wise; God chose the weak things of the world to shame the strong.
1 Corinthians 1:27
He gives strength to the weary and increases the power of the weak.
“Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.”
But when you give to the needy, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, so that your giving may be in secret. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you.
Here is some more of Nietzsche’s philosophy:
Christianity is called the religion of pity. – Pity stands in antithesis to the tonic emotions which enhance the energy of the feeling of life: it has a depressive effect. One loses force when one pities. The loss of force which life has already sustained through suffering is increased and multiplied even further by pity. Suffering itself becomes contagious through pity; sometimes it can bring about a collective loss of life and life-energy which stands in an absurd relation to the quantum of its cause (– the case of the death of the Nazarene). This is the first aspect; but there is an even more important one. If one judges pity by the value of the reactions which it usually brings about, its mortally dangerous character appears in a much clearer light. Pity on the whole thwarts the law of evolution, which is the law of selection.
Twilight of Idols and Anti-Christ, Friedrich Nietzsche, page 129.
Nietzsche explains two antithetical or inverse halves or diametrical opposites. Darwinism, natural selection and survival of the fittest, non-caring and non-sympathy and on the other hand Christian charity, sympathy, compassion and pity. By stating: ‘Pity on the whole thwarts the law of evolution, which is the law of selection’, Nietzsche is telling us that there is something wrong with pity (something like the animals). This confirms that Christianity’s inverse nature, the so called Jewish and Christian ’inversion of values’ and slave morality are perfectly right. This shows why the Holocaust happened and why the Nazis were diametrically and 180° inverse to Christian compassion and pity – in that the Nazis did not really have pity. With euthanasia and the destruction of life in the death camps, the Nazis clearly demonstrated that they did not really have pity. The Nazis were the inverse of Christianity and the rest of us human beings. They had 0% pity because Darwinism made Genesis redundant and because German philosophers such as Friedrich Nietzsche philosophically and intellectually inverted Christianity pity. We have got to ask Friedrich Nietzsche (and the Volk’s) why he is taking all the trouble to invert Christianity’s inverse nature and the so called Jewish and Christian ’inversion of values’? What is his ulterior motives? I believe that the Nazis may have question inverted Christianity because they in wanted to save us for hell, by saving Aryan women, evolution and life.
Christianity has taken the side of everything weak, base, ill-constituted, it has made an ideal out of opposition to the preservative instincts of strong life; it has depraved the reason even of the intellectually strongest natures by teaching men to feel the supreme values of intellectuality as sinful, as misleading, as temptations.
Twilight of Idols and Anti-Christ, Friedrich Nietzsche, page 128.
Christianity is a revolt of everything that crawls along the ground directed against that which is elevated: the Gospel of the ‘lowly’ makes low…
Twilight of Idols and Anti-Christ, Friedrich Nietzsche, page 168.
The weak and ill-constituted shall perish: first principle of our charity. And people shall help them to do so. What is more injurious than any crime? – Practical sympathy for all the ill-constituted and weak: – Christianity…
Sword of the Spirit: An Offering of Nietzschean Philosophy to the Soldiers of the Third Reich, by Friedrich Nietzsche, location 1594.
Contrary to Jesus Christ’s teachings, Nietzsche is saying that the Literally Universal God (LUG) does not reward those who are saintly, compassionate and charitable to the weak, poor and sick. He is saying that only animals practice charity and take care of the weak, sick and injured.
NEVER question LUG!
Hitler was guided by the “nearly ironclad principle” of “Nature’s will to live” in the “internal exclusivity of species among all living beings on earth.” …If unequal individuals were crossed, the offspring “no doubt will be superior to the racially inferior parental half, but not as advanced as the superior one. As a result it will later lose out in the struggle against a superior type. Such mating contradicts Nature’s will to improve breeds.” The result of this “ubiquitous instinct for racial purity in Nature is not only the sharp demarcations dividing individual races, but also their own internally uniform nature.” These “iron laws of Nature” were also responsible for the evolution of human history, in which race and racial purity were allotted decisive significance.
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 628
The purpose of the camps was to achieve the goal of a superior race by “breeding,” a term that originally referred only to the systematic increase and eventual improvement of animals and plants, but that Charles Darwin applied to humans. “With the exception of the human case, no breeder is so ignorant as to allow his worst animals to reproduce.” In this sense, the term “breeding” was taken up by Houston Stewart Chamberlain and völkisch theorists such as Josef Lanz for their program of racial biology.
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 742
Hitler believed that what we today recognize as the human gene pool could be improved by using selective breeding, similar to how farmers breed superior cattle.
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 931
Hitler also deduced that under conditions of limited reproduction, if the birth rate decreased, then the natural struggle for existence, which allows only the strongest and healthiest to survive, will be replaced by the mistaken anti-evolutionary desire to save the weakest and sickest.
In other words, the inferior races must be destroyed to make room for the superior races, and what Hitler believed was misplaced Christian humaneness will only interfere with this goal.
Hitler believed that humans were animals to which the genetic laws learned from livestock breeding can, and should, be applied.
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 1032 – 1051
Germany’s main father of Darwinism, Ernst Haeckel, argued in his Natural History of Creation (1868) that “the church with its morality of love and charity is an effete fraud, a perversion of the natural order.” This natural order, namely Darwinian natural selection, functions “without the recourse to mercy or compassion in the Judeo-Christian tradition.” The Nazis also viewed Darwinism and Christianity as polar opposites because Christianity makes no distinction of race or of colour; it seeks to break down all racial barriers. In this respect, the hand of Christianity is against that of Nature, for are not the races of mankind the evolutionary harvest which Nature has toiled through long ages to produce? May we not say, then, that Christianity is anti-evolutionary in its aim?
As you can see by the above quote of Ernst Haeckel, (Darwinian natural selection, functions “without the recourse to mercy or compassion in the Judeo-Christian tradition.”) that Darwinian natural selection is natural, while Christianity mercy and compassion is supernatural. The Nazis tried to stop animals.
A major reason why Hitler opposed Christianity was that he viewed it and science as diametrically opposed to each other. Hitler concluded that, in the end, science would win and that the Christian church would eventually be destroyed.
Martin Bormann, Hitler’s closest associate for years, and one of the most powerful men in Nazi Germany, was equally blunt: the church was opposed to evolution and for this reason the church must be aggressively opposed. He stressed that the Nazis were on the side of science and evolution, not Christianity.
That Hitler’s opposition to Christianity was based on Darwinism was detailed by Oxford historian Alan Bullock, who wrote that Hitler “showed the sharpest hostility” toward Christianity because, in Hitler’s eyes Christianity was a religion fit only for slaves; he detested its ethics in particular. Its teachings, he declared, was a rebellion against the natural law of selection by struggle and the survival of the fittest.
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 1400 – 1422
Bormann made his absolute disdain for Christianity and his open hostility and support of breaking the church as rapidly as possible absolutely clear. He was one of many high-level Nazis who “intended eventually to destroy Christianity” for the reason that “National Socialism and Christianity are irreconcilable” because Nazism is based on science and science had superseded the Christian church, which he regarded as anti-science. He added “National Socialism and Christian concepts are incompatible” because the Christian churches were all built on the ignorance of men and strive to keep large portions of the people in ignorance because only in this way can the Christian Churches maintain their power. On the other hand, National Socialism is based on scientific foundations. Christianity’s immutable principles, which were laid down almost two thousand years ago, have increasingly stiffened into life-alien dogmas. National Socialism, however, if it wants to fulfill its task further, must always guide itself according to the newest data of scientific researchers.
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 3882
As I will try to demonstrate to you by the time that this essay has finished, contrary to Bormann, science will never supersede religion or Christianity. This is the danger of having too much faith in science such as Darwinism. Because Darwinism superseded Genesis, people (particularly in Germany) took this too literally and believed that Darwinism (or science) had superseded Christianity. As will you will see by how Bormann regarded Christianity as ‘anti-science’, the Literally Universal Religion (LUR) is also ‘anti-science’ because it believes in miracles (as demonstrated by Jesus Christ turning water into wine etc) which break the rational laws of science. Nothing beingsbelieve that in order to explore space humanity may need to attain the miraculous like Jesus Christ.
Almost all Nazi leaders were enslaved to Darwinian ideas and ideals, and almost all were strongly opposed to Christianity to the degree that they eventually wanted to eradicate it from Europe.
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 275
Furthermore, Himmler not only “lost his religious faith” in college, but came to believe that Christianity was “merely another manifestation of Jewish superstition” that polluted German culture. He became such a fanatical anti-Christian that he declared the Nazis “shall not rest until we have rooted out Christianity” from Nazi-controlled Europe.
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 4100
Ironically, this church support of Hitler’s schemes did little to endear these churches to the Nazi leadership. Even though many Nazis were raised in suitably religious homes, most of Hitler’s disciples were as virulently anti-Christian (they were especially opposed to the Catholic church) as they were anti-Semitic, thanks to the influence of their anti-Christian professors, the “theological liberalism that was really secular philosophy disguised by religious language” and their involvement in the anti-Christian Nazi movement.
In fact, as we will document, the Nazi leadership planned to destroy Christianity after the war and replace it with a German church worshipping Hitler and the Nazi Party with elements of pre-Christian paganism. A 150-volume U.S. government report titled, The Nuremberg Project, was prepared under the direction of General William Donovan to document Nazi war crimes for the Nuremberg War Crimes Trial. Part of the 150 volumes was a 108-page report titled, The Nazi Master Plan, which concluded the Nazis “sought to eliminate the Christian Churches in Germany” after the war.
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 369
Although Hitler told the new Reichstag, “The rights of churches will not be diminished,” he revealed his true feelings in private, explaining to intimates that he would tolerate the churches temporarily for political reasons. “But,” he added, “that won’t stop me from stamping out Christianity in Germany, root and branch. One is either a Christian or a German. One can’t be both!”
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 442
Darwinism influenced not only the development of the worldwide eugenics movement but also the academic elite’s attempt to disenfranchise Christianity.
As you can see above, the Nazis were with Darwinism. Nazism was grounded on Darwinism and science and not Christianity. Unfortunately Germany’s ‘academic elite’ tried to ‘disenfranchise Christianity’, but Jesus Christ is not the problem. I am just trying to demonstrate to you that religion is fundamental, and is better than intelligence and academia, which can in theory be evil.
As this book will document, in almost all cases, acceptance of Darwinism was accompanied by the rejection of Christianity, either as a cause or an effect. Many leading Nazis, such as Martin Bormann, were aggressively hostile to Christianity and what it stood for.
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 617
Hitler made his own religious beliefs very clear as an adult: “I myself am a heathen to the core.”
Although Hitler often claimed Germany’s war was about such traditional reasons as the need for more lebensraum (living space for the superior race to expand into), he made it clear that he “hated Christianity” and eventually was going to eradicate it after the war ended.
One reason for Hitler’s fervent opposition to Christianity was that he believed that “it had crippled everything noble about humanity.” In words reported to be Hitler’s, “The heaviest blow that ever struck humanity was the coming of Christianity.” Hitler was influenced by one of his idols, Alfred Rosenberg, who taught that the Old Testament was a Jewish book, and for this reason Christianity, which is based on the Hebrew Scriptures, must be eliminated from Germany. His reasoning was based on his belief that Christianity was an “illegitimate” Jewish child and, as a Jewish child, it was swine like its parent—both needed to be eradicated. Although Hitler singled out the Jesuits for special scorn, all of Christianity was “Jewish Christianity,” which was comparable with “Jewish Bolshevism.” Hitler considered Christianity the “invention of the Jew Saul.” In short “the Aryan race had been conquered by the Semitic spirit in the form of Christianity. Christianity was…a Semitic import, which had weakened the fabric of the Aryan race by virtue of introducing moral commandments, which protected the weak from the strong.” Hitler concluded that Judaism and Christianity were both evil, calling them Bolshevists, swine or worse, and for this reason, both had to be destroyed.
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 1365 – 1375
Alfred Rosenberg ‘taught that the Old Testament was a Jewish book, and for this reason Christianity, which is based on the Hebrew Scriptures, must be eliminated from Germany’ as well as Rosenberg‘s ‘belief that Christianity was an “illegitimate” Jewish child and, as a Jewish child, it was swine like its parent—both needed to be eradicated.’ This kind of German spirituality shows that the Volk and the Nazis detested the inordinate spiritual influence of Christianity over the entire world, and this is what the Nazis tried to eradicate. But remember, the Jews are not alone. As Christians, we would have been the same.
In a talk given by Hitler on April 7, 1933, Hitler made it absolutely clear that in Germany’s future there would be “no place” in the German “utopia for the Christian Churches” and “nothing will prevent me from eradicating totally, root and branch, all Christianity in Germany.… A German Church, a German Christianity, it is all rubbish.… One is either Christian or German.”
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 1463
This conforms to official Nazi writings, which espoused both anti-Semitic and anti-Christian ideas that “had a single purpose. Hitler’s aim was to eradicate all religious organizations within the state and to foster a return to paganism.”
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 1628
Soon Hitler became Bormann’s “God,” and he determined that “rather than believe in Jesus Christ, the Germans were to worship Adolf Hitler.”
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 3809
Such realities as ‘the church with its morality of love and charity is an effete fraud, a perversion of the natural order’ and ‘in Hitler’s eyes Christianity was a religion fit only for slaves’ and ‘it [Christianity] had crippled everything noble about humanity’ and ‘The heaviest blow that ever struck humanity was the coming of Christianity’, all sound Nietzschean regarding the ‘inversion of values’ and ‘master-slave morality’. This is the difference between science and religion, in that, science is natural, amoral and soulless while Christianity is supernatural. Therefore, this is what Nazism and Nietzsche did missed, namely that the miracle of the Jesus Christ was to inverse the laws of nature. Animals naturally select their fittest mates simply to procreate and propagate the species, while natural selection among humans is supernatural. Animals are amoral, and as there is no morality or supernatural attainment in the animal kingdom, there is nothing supernatural in eugenics or the artificial selection of human beings. There is no nirvana in the animal kingdom. The Literally Universal God (LUG) made sure that the morality of the stories of the nativity and the Great Renunciation were inverse and opposite to our money-oriented animal instincts.
The basis of his [Adolf Hitler’s] worldview was “a central concept of National Socialist ideology,” namely that the Darwinian “struggle for existence governed all beings,” and involved “the right of the stronger applied to individuals as well as to communities” to suppress the racially inferior who were destined for destruction. For the “sake of self-preservation” a “stronger race will displace the weak ones,” and the “ridiculous fetters of so-called humanity” would break asunder, “in order to allow in its place the humanity of Nature, which destroys the weak in order to make way for the strong.”
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 628
Hitler used this Darwinistic philosophy to support his belief that, contrary to Christianity, the strong must dominate the weak, and the evolution of life would be impossible if this “law of Nature” was not allowed to prevail. In the struggle for life, the weak succumb, and the right to propagate is given “by Nature” only to the strongest. Struggle is the means by which a superior species survives and a weaker one perishes.
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 988
Hitler admitted that one might be “repelled by this law of nature which demands that all living things should mutually devour one another,” but the fact is that the “fly is snapped up by a dragon-fly, which itself is swallowed by a bird, which itself falls victim to a larger bird…to know the laws of nature enables us to obey them.”
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 1098
The above quote regarding flies and dragon-flies demonstrates that Adolf Hitler believed more in the laws of the realm of insects, which is evil, and rejected Christianity which is divine and supernatural. Adolf Hitler therefore, inverted Christianity and applied the evil laws of the insect world to the human race. There is nothing to believe in regarding the evolutionary laws of the insect and animal kingdoms.
In fact, much of the opposition to the eugenics movement came from conservative German Christians such as the confessing church. One reason was the confessing church’s Christian teaching that we should protect the poor, the weak and the sick, teachings that opposed Nazi eugenic goals.
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 1441
The reason was that the Church taught such doctrines as the need to help the weak and poor. Journalist Stewart Herman wrote that the “teaching of mercy and love of neighbor is foreign to the German race and the Sermon on the Mount is, according to Nordic sentiment, an ethic for cowards and idiots.”
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 4848
“Life does not forgive weakness.”
Goebbels adopted this view, writing in his diary that “man is and remains an animal—here a beast of prey, there a house pet, but always an animal.”
Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview, by Jerry Bergman, location 4404
Re-inversion of values.
The reason that the Nazis performed the Holocaust was because the Nazis were fundamentally inverse to Christianity. Anti-Christianity is inverse to hence it is evil. As mentioned earlier I recommended that we should try to get into the head of the Nazis to try to understand how they saw the Holocaust as in any way good or right? I believe the Nazis wanted to stop animals. I believe the the reason the Holocaust happened was that the Nazis (helped by Darwinism and anti-Christian philosophers as Friedrich Nietzsche) were natural and fundamentally 180° diametrically inverse to Christianity. They were inverse to Jesus Christ’s inverse nature. They were fundamentally inverse to Friedrich Nietzsche’s so called Jewish and Christian inversion of valuations (which is a term and was designed to detract from Judaism and Christianity). This is why I am trying to ‘re-inverse’ science into religion, that is to re-inverse the Nietzschean ‘inverse of valuations’ so that we can actually use Christianity’s inverse nature positively. It was the Nazis nature and anti-Christianity, their belief in science such as Darwinism (backed up by philosophers such as Nietzsche) which was the cause of the Holocaust. The Holocaust was the inverse of Christianity, or the inverting of Christianity into hate, not just the Jewish question. If you are truly Christian you will not be anti-Semitic. And no one asked the Christian question more than Friedrich Nietzsche a long time before the Nazis came to power. Darwinism made the divine Genesis redundant and people (especially in Germany) seemed to take this literally. This combination of Darwinism and inverse anti-Christian philosophies such as Nietzscheanism may have combined to create a 180° diametrically inverse worldview or faith in Germany in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries which led or pointed the Nazis to the Holocaust. This inverted Christianity led to the Holocaust. Having too much faith in science and rejecting fundamental religion and Christianity is bad, because such natural, sceptical and atheistic science fundamentally led the Nazis towards the Holocaust. Because Darwinism and evolution are right that does not void Christianity. Fundamentally, the Holocaust was the direct result of the Germans’ pagan and Darwinian faith or inverse belief system and because they were anti-Christian. If you are anti-Christian you are evil. Therefore, what Adolf Hitler meant by life does not forgive weakness, is that nature and animals have sympathy for weakness. This is Christianity’s inverse nature and the so called Christian and Jewish ‘inversion of valuations’. Therefore, humans are supernatural. Because the Germans wanted to prove Friedrich Nietzsche’s philosophy and their Darwinian survival of the fittest philosophy right and because they inverted Christianity, they therefore, actually made us question love, morality and compassion. Don’t hesitate about or question Christianity and the so called Jewish and Christian ‘inversion of valuations’ for a even a Planck length of time. There isn’t a single atom, particle or iota wrong with the love, morality and compassion, and therefore, there isn’t a single atom, particle or iota wrong with the Israelites. Because of Darwinism and such highly intellectual German philosophers as Friedrich Nietzsche and his highly advanced and diametrically inverse (to Christianity) theories such as his inversion of valuations and master-slave morality, the Nazis were anti-Christian. The inverse of valuations attacked Christian compassion, sympathy and pity (which Nietzsche saw as weak) and valued Greco-Roman pride, power and that which is full of vitality and life asserting (which Nietzsche saw as strong). Combined with science such as the Darwinian natural selection and survival of the fittest theory, Nietzsche’s (philosophical) inversion of valuations and master-slave morality inverted Christianity for Adolf Hitler. Adolf Hitler and the Nazis came along and consummated the inversion of Christianity. How do we re-invert Christianity? Firstly, we could use the Ismless + ism to mathematically perfect Protestantism and separate from regional religions, get up and clear above all lower, regional and biased religions (such as Judaism, Christianity and Islam) and create a neutral and 0% bias religion and races on planet earth. We can therefore, use the Ismlessism to extirpate all racial and religious biases and hopefully defuse all sectarian or interfaith tensions and conflicts around the world. Most importantly, we need to be Protestants, because this is what Nietzsche and the Nazis missed. We need to be religious to appease the Jews. Therefore, to invert hate into the love is simple, we all need to deliberately be the opposite of Nietzsche’s idea and be devout and practicing Protestants, separate and nothing beings. Therefore, we should all try to practice the inverse nature of Christianity. The easiest way to be Christian is to be charitable.
Christianity over Darwinism (Resurrection).
Because the Nazis were spiritually 180° diametrically onverse to Christianity it is almost as if ‘something’ big fundamentally pointed or led them in the diametrically opposite direction? I believe that ‘something’ may have been unrestricted and unchecked belief in rational, sceptical, faithless and Godless science? Anyway, it’s so weird but, despite the fact that he is 100% innocent and certainly an outstanding soul, however, Charles Darwin is more responsible for the Holocaust than anyone else in history (way more than Friedrich Nietzsche). Charles Darwin’s scientific theory of natural selection. At some point, prehistoric hominins stopped being just natural and instinctive and they began to be supernatural such as compassionately caring for or nursing sick or injured elder or even unrelated stranger human beings back to health. Thousands or perhaps even tens of thousands of years later, Judaism and Christianity took the supernatural care, love, pity and compassion for the poor, the weak, the sick, the loathsome and the injured and eternalised it through the the New Testament. Because Charles Darwin was certainly a wonderful, outstanding human being, there can only be a lesson concerning unchecked evolution versus Christianity. Therefore, there is a dangerous lesson regarding science making religion redundant. Natural selection superseded Genesis, which may have had huge anti-Semitic and anti-Christian consequences in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries which led to the Holocaust. Science, Darwinism, natural selection and survival of the fittest theory were the philosophy and belief system of the Nazis. Unrestricted and unchecked belief in science, Darwinism and Nietzscheanism, and the subsequent rejection of and disbelief in Christianity guided the Nazis throughout the early twentieth century and was responsible for the Holocaust. When a male lion overthrows another male lion of a pride he quickly kills all the cubs of the defeated male lion because they are not his direct offspring. In nature this is right! However, imagine if a male lion did foster-father the cubs of another defeated male lion? This would be supernatural. Human beings should be natural supernatural. Western governments can instil their citizens to be supernatural with an extreme Protestant revolution and separate from regional religions using Ismless + ism and indoctrinate their citizens to be supernatural and less scientific.
Fundamental and literal universality.
How Ismless + ism was discovered.
Re-inversion of valuations.
Learn from regional religions.
Literally Universal Religion (LUR).
How to get to space (practice nothing).
Different species (separation).