9. DIFFERENT SPECIES (SEPARATION).

Preface.
Introduction.
Fundamental and literal universality.
How Ismless + ism was discovered.
Re-inversion of valuations.
Learn from regional religions.
Literally Universal Religion (LUR).
How to get to space (practice nothing).
Different species (separation).
Conclusion.

1 is finite. 1 does not evolve.

I believe that the Literally Universal Religion (LUR) changes, alters or makes null and void the First Commandment of The Ten Commandments. I believe this because the Ismlessism categorically proves that the Literally Universal God (LUG) is absolutely, fundamentally, mathematically and scientifically 0 and yet everything in the universe. Therefore, the Literally Universal God (LUG) is not and never is 1 (as in Chesney Hawkes). He is absolute 0 and everything in the universe. The reason why the Literally Universal God (LUG) is 0 and ∞ is because He is every living creature in the universe, not just human beings. If the Literally Universal God (LUG) is 0 and ∞ He can have every ism in the universe. In heaven we may all be equal to the Literally Universal God (LUG) if we make ourselves nothing beings. Being nothing is the only way that the Literally Universal God (LUG) can make Himself literally universal. However, down here in life or on earth ‘nothing’ is equal to the Literally Universal God (LUG). This means we have to make ourselves ‘nothing’ to become equal to the Literally Universal God (LUG). Only the Buddha and Jesus Christ are equal to the Literally Universal God (LUG) down here on earth because they owned ‘nothing’ or the spirit or nirvana. Only in the afterlife is everything (and everybody) equal to the Literally Universal God (LUG). What if because the Literally Universal God (LUG) is 0 and ∞, that 0theism makes human beings consciously more equal to the spirit, nirvana, the Literally Universal God (LUG), aliens or the Loch Ness monster? I refer to aliens and the Loch Ness monster because they are the only things in the universe (apart from the spirit or nirvana) which are mysterious, magical, mystical and above the normal and mundane. Monotheism has human beings in an unbelievably slavish and servile position in relation to the wrathful and judgemental 1 God. The 1 God of Abraham and Moses was a wrathful and vengeful God and He commanded us mere mortal human beings to ‘worship Him and Him alone!’ The monotheistic God was a wrathful, vengeful and jealous God. The monotheistic God demanded worship! However, what if 0theism makes all creatures and all human beings more equal to the Literally Universal God (LUG)? All that I am saying is that because 0theism determines that the Literally Universal God (LUG) is 0 and ∞, that belief in 0theism may actually make human beings more consciously equal to the spirit, nirvana, the Literally Universal God (LUG), aliens or the Loch Ness monster (if we make ourselves nothing)? Although this equality is only attained upon death, at least we can know it while we are alive and down here on earth and that we will be more equal to the Literally Universal God (LUG) in the afterlife. Because there is not 1 Literally Universal God (LUG) on planet earth, but 2 – the Buddha and Jesus Christ (who are similar to mystical aliens or the Loch Ness monster) – this proves that the Literally Universal God (LUG) is not 1 but 0 and ∞. Like how on planet earth there is one the Literally Universal God (LUG) for the east and one the Literally Universal God (LUG) for the west, there will be a myriad of other nirvana attainers on the innumerable other habitable planets in the universe. Therefore, the Literally Universal God (LUG) is 0 and ∞. I have read Catholicism For Dummies (I had to get down!) and this is what the Catholic Church has to say about the First Commandment:

The First Commandment is “I am the Lord your God, you shall not have strange gods before Me.” This commandment forbids idolatry, the worship of false gods and goddesses, and it forbids polytheism, the belief in many gods, insisting instead on monotheism, the belief in one God.

Catholicism All-In-One For Dummies, by various authors, page 177.

There are two things to point out here, firstly, obviously Moses did not have the Literally Universal Religion (LUR) and Ismlessism back in 1400 BC (or natural selection or Big Bang Theory), so naturally he and the ancient Hebrews simply counted the Literally Universal God (LUG). Therefore, even with the Ismlessism it is almost natural to count the Literally Universal God (LUG) as one and to say that even though He is 0 and ∞ He is still numerically 1 the Literally Universal God (LUG). But He is not! To be 0 and ∞ does not say anything. To be 0 and ∞ is like levitating. 0 is nothing and might as well not be a number, while infinity is an ineffable and unattainable number. Because 1 is finite, I believe to say that the Literally Universal God (LUG) is 1 is ironically and not coincidentally blasphemous and idolatrous. To count the Literally Universal God (LUG) as 1 or to say that there is 1 God is as blasphemous and idolatrous as it was to the ancient Israelites to utter the ineffable Name of God, as in YHWH or Yahweh. The Literally Universal God (LUG) is 0 and ∞ and He and we are all equal to everything else and to everybody else in the universe. The Literally Universal God (LUG) has 0% vanity; He may be beyond praise and credit for His Creation (creatio ex nihilo) of everything out of nothing. Perhaps the Literally Universal God (LUG) just wants to be normal? Also, regarding polytheism, because the Literally Universal God is ismless and allows 0 isms, He does not care in the least if we are zerotheistic, monotheistic or polytheistic like the Hindus. As along as you at least have fundamental faith in Him over fundamental science. The Literally Universal God (LUG) is ismless, and I can tell you that He definitely is now because of Adolf Hitler.

The indefinite article?

The problem or mistake that monotheism makes is to count the Literally Universal God (LUG). For example, I could unbelievably humbly and obsequiously say that I am ‘a’ nothing being or ‘a’ 0theistic person, as in I am absolutely nothing, which is completely true. However, as you can see that the indefinite article ‘a’ almost counts as 1. This is probably the mistake that monotheists such as Abraham, Moses and the Israelites made. They counted the indefinite article ‘a’ as 1. However, monotheists would not refer to YHWH or Allah as ‘a’ God, because ‘a’ God implies that there may be other strange and foreign Gods. The definite article ‘the’ God (which is a Muslim description) also blasphemously implies that there is 1 Literally Universal God (LUG). It was once a law punishable by stoning to death in Judaism to utter the ineffable name of God or YHWH. Hence, I believe that 0theism is similar, in that the Literally Universal God (LUG) is ineffably 0 (which is nothing and is not a number) and ∞ (which is an indeterminate, indescribable and unattainable number that simply gives us or comes back as time). To say that the Literally Universal God (LUG) is nothing and everything or that the Literally Universal God (LUG) is 0 and ∞ does not actually say anything. To say that the Literally Universal God (LUG) is 0 and ∞ is a bit like levitating or limbo dancing. It says nothing! For monotheists such as Abraham and Moses, it was a very subtle mistake to make in indeed, that is, to count the indefinite article ‘a’ as 1. Therefore, how do we describe ourselves individually as nothing beings without using the indefinite article ‘a’? Perhaps we nothing beings are so modest that we even say that we are not 1 or ‘an’ individual (like Chesney Hawkes), but like the Literally Universal God (LUG), we are everyone and all living creatures in the entire universe. We are not one for all and all for one, like the three musketeers. We are nothing and individually ‘a’ nothing being yet every living creature in the cosmos. 0 and ∞ is ‘a’ nothing being. Who is the Literally Universal God (LUG)? It is too easy to say that the Literally Universal God (LUG) is 1 individual. The only way that the Literally Universal God (LUG) can make Himself literally universal is by making Himself literally 0 and ∞, which is mysteriously and mystically the spirit, nirvana, aliens, Bigfoot or the Loch Ness monster. We can understand the monotheistic error of counting the indefinite article ‘a’ as 1 or 1 God. The indefinite article ‘a’ is simply a mistake. The indefinite article is a little bit of a tongue twister or a slip of the tongue, but we nothing beings and the Literally Universal God (LUG) understand the indefinite article ‘a’ and how the ancient Israelites may have counted it. The indefinite article ‘a’ is 1 and we do not want 1 we want 0 and ∞. We are individually nothing beings yet there are many other nothing creatures in the universe.

Mathematics of the Literally Universal God (LUG).

As I have stated I believe the First Commandment may need adjusting because the Literally Universal God (LUG) is 0 and ∞ and not 1. I will thus demonstrate the mathematics of the Literally Universal God (LUG) to you. We should never numerically count the Literally Universal God (LUG) in some mistakenly fundamental way as 1 God. If you want to describe the Literally Universal God (LUG) in some numerical way it is better to simply say He is ‘everything’. Everything is an ineffable and unreachable infinite number. Therefore, the Literally Universal God (LUG) is both absolute 0 and an ineffable and unreachable infinite number. We cannot describe the ineffable and Literally Universal God (LUG) with mere human words; and so counting the Literally Universal God (LUG) as 1 or any other finite number is blasphemous and idolatrous. Out of all the numbers in infinity the ancient Hebrews gave God the number 1, as if the number 1 is fundamental or holy in some way? I say that 0 and ∞ are more fundamental. Counting to 1 does not get very far does it? 1 is finite! Therefore, the Literally Universal God (LUG) is both 0 and ∞, which is ineffable and indescribable.

God = 0 & ∞

God ≠ 1

0 = ∞

Just as a little more of the mathematics of God, finite 1 can be divided as in 1/2 = 0.5. However, 0 will never change when dividing or multiplying it by any number.

0/1 = 0

And

0 * 1 = 0

However, the most important rule is that you cannot divide by 0. 

1/0 = undefined

1/0 = ∞

Mathematical Name and symbol of the Literally Universal God (LUG).

Mathematical Name and symbol of the Literally Universal God (LUG).

The Jews have many names for God, including, YHWH, El, Eloah, Elohim, Elohei, El Shaddai, Tzevaot, Yah, Adonai, Baal, Ehyeh asher ehyeh, Elah, El Roi, Elyon, Eternal One, HaShem, Shalom and Shekhinah. Christianity obviously calls God God or the Father. Islam has 99 names for God, but obviously the most famous name of God in Islam as Allah. However, the Ismlessism has other names to describe God in less human and more inclusive alien terms, such as the Literally Universal God (LUG), however, most importantly, the Ismlessism has the mathematical name of the Literally Universal God (LUG), which I will now demonstrate to you. You will notice that the Ismlessism is the simplest fundamental, mathematical and scientific concept in the universe, it is 2 things 0 and ∞. However, 0 and ∞ never perform any mathematical functions (or arithmetic) such as division, multiplication, addition or subtraction. 0 and ∞ are 2 numbers which never meet and perform no mathematical arithmetic. 0 and ∞ are separated numbers. 0 and ∞ do not say 1 or any other finite (and blasphemous) number. 0 and ∞ are algebraic. 0 and ∞ are like levitating or limbo dancing. 0 and ∞ is the mathematical name of the Literally Universal God (LUG). The Literally Universal God (LUG) is ismless, which means that He has 0 isms which is inverted into ∞. Because the Literally Universal God (LUG) has 0 isms He is therefore, 0% biased between all races, species and religions in the universe. The Literally Universal God (LUG) is fundamentally, underneath and at the core 0 and ∞. The fact that 0 and ∞ are separate and do not divide, multiply, perform any mathematical functions or arithmetic proves that Jesus Christ (the Literally Universal God (LUG)) does not want to do any arithmetic, trigonometry, calculus or any advanced science. Because the Literally Universal God (LUG) is 0 and ∞ and not 1 googolplex (+ 1 or * 2), this is why 0 and ∞ are separate and why 0 and ∞ never divide or multiply or perform any complex arithmetic. What is 0/∞ or ∞/0? Because ∞ is an invisible number, 0/∞ or ∞/0 is impossible, they never happen. 0 and ∞ are chilled and relaxed. The mathematical name of the Literally Universal God (LUG) (0 and ∞) is as high, advanced, precise and complex as religion will be and as low, primitive, imprecise and simple as science will go. The mathematical name of God is the maximum scientific complexity that religion will be and the minimum fundamental and precision that science demands.

I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End.

Revelation 22:13.

“I am the Alpha and the Omega,” says the Lord God, “who is, and who was, and who is to come, the Almighty.”

Revelation 1:8.

What if females are 0 and males are ∞? Is the Literally Universal God (LUG) both female and male? Is female genitalia 0 and male genitalia and ejaculation ∞? Is the male ejaculation like counting to ∞? If 0 and ∞ unite or join in some way does that create progeny? Therefore, is the Son of God an infinite divine erection, ejaculation or orgasm? What if the Literally Universal God (LUG) or ∞ is highly attracted 0? This might also require a rethink for Muslims who do not believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God. This is what the Quran says and Jesus Christ:

People of the Book, do not go to excess in your religion, and do not say anything about God except the truth: the Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary, was nothing more than a messenger of God, His word, directed to Mary, a spirit from Him. So believe in God and His messengers and do not speak of a ‘Trinity’—stop [this], that is better for you—God is only one God, He is far above having a son, everything in the heavens and earth belongs to Him and He is the best one to trust.

The Quran, sura 4 (Women), verse 171.

I believe the Muslims who believe that 1 God is fundamental also believe that the Trinity is not fundamental? However, as you can if Jesus Christ is an infinite divine erection, ejaculation and orgasm, not only is He spiritually clean with 0 sin, but this determines that He is the Son of God. Also remember Literally Universal God (LUG) and the spirit or the Holy Spirit are also 0 and ∞. Therefore, the Trinity is sound. Because 0 and ∞ are separate and never divide or multiply or perform any arithmetic, perhaps females and males should be piously and chastely segregated in some way? Roman Catholicism is sex.

Agnosticism and atheism (nothing is impossible).

The English biologist Thomas Henry Huxley coined the word agnostic in 1869, and said “It simply means that a man shall not say he knows or believes that which he has no scientific grounds for professing to know or believe.”

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agnosticism

Creationists and some other people believe that the Literally Universal God (LUG) Created everything, for example Creationists believe that the Literally Universal God (LUG) Created animals. However, scientists believe that evolution and natural things such as natural selection and survival of the fittest created animals. What do you think? I believe in 100% independence in life as in the Literally Universal God (LUG) does not give us anything (or something) for free or for nothing, in that we animals have to evolve and work out or discover things independently for ourselves, such as metal work, agriculture, writing and the Ismlessism etc. I believe independence is a part of life in that if the Literally Universal God (LUG) did give us things for free in life we may not have 100% satisfaction upon death. So did the Literally Universal God (LUG) have anything to do with life on earth? Did the Literally Universal God (LUG) create life out of nothing? It’s hard to believe that He didn’t! However, evolution tells us that He didn’t and that creatures are not designed by the Literally Universal God (LUG), but create or evolve themselves through natural things such natural selection and survival of the fittest. You either believe in the Literally Universal God (LUG) or you do not. For example, Richard Dawkins, is a British evolutionary biologist and he wrote a book called The God Delusion in which he contends that a supernatural creator, God, almost certainly does not exist, and that belief in a personal god qualifies as a delusion, which he defines as a persistent false belief held in the face of strong contradictory evidence. Richard Dawkins is a proponent of atheism, the critique and denial of metaphysical beliefs in God or spiritual beings. Much of Dawkins’s work has generated debate for asserting the supremacy of science over religion in explaining the world. Clearly Richard Dawkins and I are polars apart, however, what if Richard Dawkins believed in LUG who is fundamental and 0 and ∞?  What if Richard Dawkins believed in the scientific and mathematical name of the Literally Universal God (LUG)? As stated the Ismlessism is the solution to atheism because it’s like believing in nothing or that the Literally Universal God (LUG) is nothing and everything. This is how the Literally Universal God (LUG) saves the souls of even the most ardent of atheists. For example, there is literally nothing atheists can say. For example, an atheist can try as hard as he or she wants to say that I believe absolutely nothing! But the more or harder you believe in nothing the more you believe in the Literally Universal God (LUG). Nothing is impossible. For there to be nothing or 0 existence is impossible. Everything is simply because. There cannot be nothing. Nothing is impossible answers the question why am I here? The answer is nothing is impossible and so just because. Therefore, there is nothing atheists can say. For example, an atheist can say I don’t believe in anything! But this is like denying existence or reality. If you don’t believe in anything you believe in nothing which is the Literally Universal God (LUG). So atheism is a paradox. The Buddha and Jesus Christ (like His resurrection) must have attained the impossible. Therefore, to atheist scientists such as Richard Dawkins, a scientific and mathematical the Literally Universal God (LUG) who is 0 and ∞ is not too bad? I believe that it may have been this rational and sceptical belief of science over religion or evolution over religion which led the Nazis in the 180° diametrically opposite or inverse direction of the Abrahamic religions and which led them down the path to the Holocaust. What if the Literally Universal God (LUG) set life in motion? I am not saying that I do not believe in evolution, natural selection and survival of the fittest, I just believe that the Literally Universal God (LUG) must have had something to do with it and that clearly the Holocaust tells us that religion should always come before, over and above sceptical and rational science.

Fundamental revolution.

In Islam innovation in religion is forbidden!

“People who innovate in religion or do as they please about it go to the fire of hell, in accord with the hadith.”

Islam For Dummies, by Malcolm Clark, page 62.

I believe that this may have something to do with fundamentalism, which means living by the literal word of scripture. For example, if someone was to say that amputations for thieves (which the Quran instructs and which some Islamic countries today still practice) is no longer applicable, this would constitute an innovation in religion? Like how the Jews no longer sacrifice animals in the Temple, which was once the law etc. However, the Ismlessism is not just an innovation, it is a fundamental revolution of the simplest and most basic core of Abrahamic religion. It is like the digital revolution… 1 to 0. The Ismlessism determines that 1 is finite and that monotheism is redundant or archaic, hence, the Ismlessism fundamentally revolutionises monotheism into 0theism or from 1 to 0 and ∞. In reality Islam comes closest to the fundamental faith of Ismlessism, but the only change for Islam would be the fundamental 1 to 0 and ∞ change. Nothing else would need to change or even matter.

Mumble jumbo.

Christianity and religion in general get a lot of ridicule from conceited science because religions such as Christianity believe in a lot of ‘mumbo jumbo’ or because religion is simple and sometimes inaccurate. For example, I have demonstrated that the First Commandment probably needs technically altering or voiding because the Literally Universal God (LUG) is razor-sharp 0 and ∞ and not clumsy and bungling 1. However, Christians are blindly and staunchly devoted to and very serious in their belief in and acceptance of the First Commandment, which can be construed as religious mumbo jumbo. The First Commandment commands that there is only 1 God and that Goddesses and polytheism are ‘right out and not on!’ So because the medieval Catholic Church burned Giordano Bruno alive at the stake and because the Ismlessism has fundamentally disproved the First Commandment, scientists therefore, snigger and chuckle at Christianity because Christianity believes in such ‘mumbo jumbo’. Therefore, the First Commandment is a simple indefinite article mistake, a little inaccurate and not exactly, scientifically and mathematically precise. Oh my Literally Universal God (LUG) they mistook 1 for 0 and ∞! Call the science and precision police! Science, particularly such as physics is unbelievably advanced and precise and it’s almost as if we all need to understand such things as quarks, muons, gluons and strange particles in order to be in heaven. However, the fundamental faith or the Ismlessism is both simple and mathematically precise. It’s 0 and ∞! Oh my Literally Universal God (LUG) that is so high, complicated and advanced! Call the not complicated enough cops! (I’m using sarcasm). The Buddha and Jesus Christ did not need to know about particle physics to own, have and possess ‘nothing’, the spirit, nirvana or to be in the kingdom of heaven. The Buddha and Jesus Christ were moral. Religion is simple and it can sometimes be inaccurate, however, faith, even simple and thick faith, such as believing that a human being rose from the dead and ascended to heaven is better than advanced, accurate, faithless and Godless science.

Revolutions of religion.

If we nothing being human beings ever get to meet aliens and to our shock, horror and surprise discover that the aliens worship goddesses, idols and practice blasphemous idolatry, we nothing beings would never judge or say ‘tut tut’ to such idolatrous aliens because we are 0% biased towards all species and faiths in the universe. However, we could teach them about the fundamental faith of Ismlessism. We could teach the aliens that we human beings went through three stages or phases of the development of our religion. First of all human beings were for eons polytheistic, idolatrous and worshipped many man made idols. Mistaken polytheism and idolatry was practiced for tens of thousands of years, from the un-recollected and unremembered dawn of time and prehistory. Ancient polytheism and idolatry became a problem and in around 1900 BC Abraham discovered strict monotheism and the 1, true, eternal, invisible and living God. Then in around 1400 BC in Egypt, Moses, the Israelites and we Abrahamic human beings had a huge monotheistic revolution and violently destroyed and repressed all blasphemous polytheism and idolatry in Western Asia. Similarly the Muslims had a monotheistic revolution in the 7th century AD in Arabia and other parts of Asia, and the Muslims also violently destroyed and repressed all forms of polytheism and idolatry in Arabia and much further a field. Next and ultimately, we extreme Protestants human beings discovered that the Ismlessism has 0 isms and is therefore, literally universal and 0% biased between all faiths in the universe, (as you would expect an omnipotent and Literally Universal God (LUG) to be). We extreme Protestants discovered the fundamental and Literally Universal Religion (LUR). We therefore, discovered that the Literally Universal God (LUG) is not 1 God, but is 0 and ∞ because 1 is finite. We therefore discovered 0theism, niltheism or zerotheism. We discovered that ironically and probably not coincidentally, that despite the fact that Moses and the Israelites vehemently meant to create an orthodox and non-blasphemous religion with an invisible and living 1 God; that ironically and probably not coincidentally, monotheism is actually blasphemous and idolatrous. However, we 21st century nothing beings understand and appreciate that Moses, the ancient Israelites and the Muslims could not have imagined prehistory or alien life. We extreme Protestants beings herefore, had a third, last and final fundamental 0theistic revolution, where we mathematically perfected Protestantism. As mentioned, the Ismlessism is not an innovation, it is a fundamental revolution of the simplest and most basic core of Abrahamic religion. It is like the digital revolution… 1 to 0. The Ismlessism determines that 1 is finite and that monotheism is redundant, hence, the Ismlessism fundamentally revolutionises monotheism into 0theism or from 1 to 0 and ∞. Extreme Protestants are separate.

The three stages of the development of religion are:

  1. Polytheism.
  2. Monotheism.
  3. Zerotheism.

Muslims claim that Allah is the same God as the God of the Hebrew and Christian scriptures, thus affirming that Islam stands in continuity with Judaism and Christianity. Muslims believe that all three religions share the same God and the same scripture, but also believe that each, in turn, claims to reform, perfect, and complete what came before.

Islam For Dummies, by Malcolm Clark, page 40.

Nothing complete.

I have read the Quran and I think and I honestly believe that despite how Islam claims that the Quran is the perfect word of God and how Islam claims that the Hebrew Scriptures and the New Testament are corrupted, that nevertheless the Hebrew Scriptures (never mind the New Testament) are as good as the Quran. I mean considering that the Muslims do not read the Hebrew Scriptures or the New Testament, you would think that the Jews and Christians would know a little more about their own scriptures than Muslims? I believe this because the Hebrew Scriptures (especially the Torah) are love and are very loving, whereas the Quran (which I also love because it is prophetical) is a bit more forceful. Because Islam is prophecy it is truly amazing and it is therefore, it is a bit of a threat to Judaism and Christianity. Unlike Hinduism, Islam violently forces people to proselytise, to convert to Islam and to submit to Allah and rightly so. However, this is why I love the Hebrew Scriptures and the New Testament. It was the fear of the threat of forceful but amazingly prophetical Islam and the fear of losing the Hebrew Scriptures to Islam and the Quran which made me realise that I actually love the Old Testament and Hebrew Scriptures (especially the Torah) as well as the New Testament. My love for the Hebrew Scriptures (especially the Torah) determines that I love the ancient Israelites such as Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, David and Solomon etc. I will believe in the prophecy of Muhammad and the Quran for eternity and I will read the Quran forever, but I am sure that there is also nothing wrong with the Hebrew, Christian or even Hindu Scriptures. We nothing beingsare neutral and 0% biased between all races, religions and even species of aliens in the universe. Therefore, the lesson of the Literally Universal Religion (LUR), which is not a just a mere heretical innovation of religion, but is in fact a fundamental revolution of the most basic core of Abrahamic or monotheistic religion from 1 to 0 (like the digital revolution), is that no human being should claim to be the final prophet of God and no religion should ever ever claim to be the completion of Abrahamic religions. There will always be more prophets, more revelations and more revolutions of religion in the eternal future. In the eternal future people will obviously discover more and better religions even than the fundamental, perfectly mathematical and symmetrical (0 isms) religion of Ismlessism. Perhaps artificial intelligence will one day create a new religion? I therefore in fact encourage everybody, especially laypeople on the outside of universities to try to write scripture and to try to discover new religions, isms and to innovate in religion. Scripture is not just prediction. Like the Prophet Muhammad, scripture teaches you about a new definition of the Literally Universal God (LUG). There will never be a last and final prophet of Abrahamic religions and there will never be a totally complete religion.

Nothing audacious.

You may say that I am being unbelievably audacious to recommend that the First Commandment of the Hebrew Bible needs adjusting, that we need a third and final fundamental religious (0theistic) revolution and that we need to mathematically perfect the Abrahamic religion? However, remember that nothing beings are nothing and less than nothing. I am an average western couch potato, therefore, how else could somebody reveal the Ismlessism or 0theism to us all? The writing is there and the theory is fundamental. We have not had a spiritual revolution in so long a time. Moses completed Abraham’s monotheistic revolution in Egypt in around 1400 BC. And nothing beingswould never forget the fact that monotheism and 0theism are practically the identical. But remember, Abraham and Moses could not have imagined prehistory or alien life. The Christians had a religious revolution in the 1st century AD, centred around Jesus Christ and the fulfilment of the Hebrew Scriptures. And I suppose that the last great human religious revolution was begun by the Prophet Muhammad in the 7th century AD with the monotheistic Islamic revolution. The 20th century had a catastrophe and the 21st century has had a digital or technological revolution (with the internet); however, we have not had a spiritual revolution in a very long time. Because the fundamental faith is literally alien and universal, we advanced 21st century nothing beings could have our own religious revolution as well as the current digital/technological revolution. The Ismlessism is simple yet modern because it would not have been possible without the internet, iPhones, iPads and MacBooks etc. This is what Moses and the Israelites unfortunately lacked. However, absolute independence is the harsh law of life. For example, nobody taught us mortal human beings how to make stone tools or anything about metal work etc. We human beings had to figure out absolutely ‘everything’ on our own. The Ismlessism is no different. Until you attain the internet and digital technology, you harshly cannot have the fundamental faith. You have got to have isms (such as racism) in the first place (to get rid of) before you attain the Ismlessism. The Ismlessism is an precise (yet simple) religion for a smart, digital and modern age. The Ismlessism is a religion for smart 21st century nothing beings, it is space spirituality and the religion for space. I don’t know, Protestantism could call an ecumenical council to discuss the accuracy of 0theism? Or they could condemn it as heresy? Is the Church still not willing to accept the existence of alien life? So you might say who the hell are you to suggest such things? However, remember, even though I am an average western nothing being, the fundamental faith was discovered after a 5 year long reading and writing endeavour to fix the Holocaust, remove racism and to redeem white people, which is not absolutely nothing. But I suppose in the scheme of things it is absolutely nothing. We should all as 21st century human beings be nothing beings. Are you a nothing being?

Nothing heretical (pure science).

Ancient and medieval people had no concept of aliens or alien life. Indeed the Catholic Church believed that the earth was flat and that the earth was the centre of the universe for a very long time. Ancient and medieval people could not imagine or think of little grey men. Giordano Bruno is known for his cosmological theories, which conceptually extended the then-novel Copernican model. He proposed that the stars were distant suns surrounded by their own planets, and he raised the possibility that these planets might foster life of their own, a cosmological position known as cosmic pluralism. He also insisted that the universe is infinite and could have no “center”. Starting in 1593, Bruno was tried for heresy by the Roman Inquisition on charges of denial of several core Catholic doctrines, including eternal damnation, the Trinity, the divinity of Christ, the virginity of Mary, and transubstantiation. Bruno’s pantheism was not taken lightly by the church, nor was his teaching of the transmigration of the soul (reincarnation). The Inquisition found him guilty, and he was burned at the stake in Rome’s Campo de’ Fiori in 1600. Galileo Galilei’s championing of Copernican heliocentrism (Earth rotating daily and revolving around the sun) was met with opposition from within the Catholic Church and from some astronomers. The matter was investigated by the Roman Inquisition in 1615, which concluded that heliocentrism was foolish, absurd, and heretical since it contradicted Holy Scripture. Galileo later defended his views in Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems (1632), which appeared to attack Pope Urban VIII and thus alienated both the Pope and the Jesuits, who had both supported Galileo up until this point. He was tried by the Inquisition, found “vehemently suspect of heresy”, and forced to recant. He spent the rest of his life under house arrest. With these two examples of Giordano Bruno and Galileo Galilei, I just wanted to point out that the Church has made some mistakes in the past, and that 0theism or the Ismlessism is absolutely no different. Although the Ismlessism proves that the Literally Universal God (LUG) is not 1 but is 0 and ∞ thus altering or voiding the First Commandment, the Ismlessism is not heresy. However, it should be reiterated that the Ismlessism is fundamental religion over fundamental science (such as Darwinism). In fact, why hasn’t anybody discovered the Ismlessism, 0theism or 0 and ∞ before? It is probably because of heresy, in that such as Giordano Bruno was burned at the stake by the Catholic Church in 1600 for suggesting cosmic pluralism? Today we are free and safe to research, investigate and discover such things as religious alien life, however, the danger and fear of heretical persecution, such as Giordano Bruno’s martyrdom and Galileo Galilei’s persecution probably put people off from discovering the Ismlessism, 0theism or 0 and ∞ for centuries. Obviously what would have been the totally taboo, sacrilegious and completely suicidal in the medieval or early modern periods would have been to question holy and sacred monotheism. In the medieval or early modern periods you would have risked your life to suggest the reality of 0theism or that God is not 1 but 0 and ∞. Therefore, if Giordano Bruno and Galileo Galilei had been permitted and even encouraged to pursue their courses and investigations in the medieval or early modern periods we may discovered the Ismlessism a lot sooner? On the other hand, the freedom to be anti-Christian, like Friedrich Nietzsche’s inversion of valuations and master-slave morality is obviously too extreme. If Friedrich Nietzsche had been burned at the stake and had Charles Darwin been censured there may have been no Holocaust. Therefore, perhaps we need sensible moderation concerning heresy? For example, as I have demonstrated through Friedrich Nietzsche and Charles Darwin, too much belief or faith in Godless pure science and a lack of care for morality may have led the Nazis down the path to the Holocaust. However, for arguments sake, religion has killed 1 person, Giordano Bruno. Godless pure science also made us imagine Godless and purely scientific little grey men who are a million years ahead of us technologically and beyond primitive mumbo jumbo religion. Sentient aliens are probably eternally religious and hence, the concept of Godless and purely scientific little grey men is also probably heretical. What we need is pure fundamental faith.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giordano_Bruno

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_Galilei

Ever 1 LUG necklace (lesson from Buddha).

An Ever 1 LUG necklace is a constant practice for Protestant men in that it fundamentally makes us resist those instinctive urges of being, thinking we are or wanting to be No. 1, like Chesney Hawkes. Never mind Neo! We real (nothing being) men never desire nirvana. Therefore, wearing nothing or an Ever 1 LUG necklace is a constant practice of modesty in that we men make ourselves ever smaller, nothing and less than nothing. Protestant women can also wear an Ever 1 LUG necklace, it’s just that men instinctively desire nirvana. Wearing an Ever 1 LUG necklace means you are a separate being. An Ever 1 LUG necklace and this whole mathematical theory of the Ismlessism needs stating, implementing, propagating and promulgating on planet earth, because without an Ever 1 LUG necklace, most men instinctively and passionately desire nirvana or to be No. 1. With an Ever 1 LUG necklace we can be a prophet, but never No. 1 and prophethood is all that we should desire. That’s what happens with what Abraham and Moses (or the Israelites) invented, that is, monotheism makes us all want to be No. 1. However, with the Ismlessism, we nothing beings do something completely different. In theory, because 0theism and the symbol of the Literally Universal God (LUG) are mathematical, no one should desire to be No. 1. Therefore, if we fundamentally do not make No. 1 then who knows what will happen or what we will attain? Our children can be so much better than us if they receive the Ismlessism and an Ever 1 LUG necklace at a very early age instead of the crucifix. They can be so much better than us who were brought up in the 1980s and 1990s (without an Ever 1 LUG necklace) on monotheism, Superman, The Matrix, The Truman Show and The Prodigy etc. Real men wear an Ever 1 LUG necklace. If all children are fundamentally and mathematically instructed not to be No. 1 at an early age, we can change society and the world. With 0theism our children could evolve to be better than us 20th century monotheistic Homo sapiens sapiens. The fundamental, universal, neutral-faith and 0% biased religion of Ismlessism actually helps to redeem, save or protect Europe and all white people. Through reading this essay again and again it has become apparent to me that the fundamental faith of Ismlessism should appease non-white people (especially Muslims) for the Holocaust. If we did not have the Literally Universal Religion (LUR), Muslims and non-white people would just continue with their retribution, war and terrorism on Europe and white people for the Holocaust. This is because the Ismlessism is religious and better than science and philosophy and because the fundamental faith is so similar to the Islamic faith. It’s almost a slip of the tongue that Islamism and Ismlessism are practically the same thing. The only mistake the Israelites and Muslims make is that they count Yahweh or Allah and give Him the finite, idolatrous and blasphemous number 1. Because Europeans discovered the Ismlessism through a gruelling and laborious, more than 5 year struggle to appease the Holocaust and forgive and redeem white people, I believe that Muslims will therefore, be appeased by the fundamental faith and the Literally Universal God (LUG) of Ismlessism? The Ismlessism is the reward or attainment of an up till now over 5 year reading and writing endeavour to redeem or protect white people through getting non-white people to forgive us and admire us, fix the Holocaust and remove or extirpate racism. Therefore, everybody, including non-white people and Muslims should believe that the Ismlessism is the real fulfilment, reward or attainment of such a dedicated, laborious and devoted endeavour. If all white people had both a regional and biased religion (such as Protestantism) as well as identifying as nothing beings and professing the Literally Universal Religion (LUR), white people would be okay to Muslims and non-white people and hence, they would be forgiven for two world wars and the Holocaust. If as a white person you identify as a nothing being by faith and for example, wear an Ever 1 LUG necklace (which you can get personalised online for £40) with the symbol of Literally Universal God (LUG) on the front and the words Ever 1, LUG, Nothing is impossible,Take down God, Infinite nothing, Evolve or Life on the back; in theory, you should be alright to Muslims and non-white people. To wear an Ever 1 LUG necklaceis to wear nothing or to be naked. Wearing an Ever 1 LUG necklacemeans that you have done something to make amends for the Holocaust. You should as a white person get off for the Holocaust. You should be okay because the Ismlessism is exactly what it is, that is, the answer or attainment of an over 5 year long endeavour to fix the Holocaust and redeem white people, which it has probably successfully accomplished. Therefore, wearing an Ever 1 LUG necklace means you have done something to make amends for the Holocaust. Through appeasing the Muslims, the Ismlessism should protect and redeem white people. As mentioned you can get a high quality Ever 1 LUG necklace personalised online for £40 (see below). Like everything else about the fundamental faith, the design of an Ever 1 LUG necklace is a very simple formula that works, hence, to make your own Ever 1 LUG necklace is trivially easy. All you need to do is upload the symbol of the Literally Universal God (LUG) to an online jewellers and tell them you want the symbol on the front and the words Ever 1, LUG, Nothing is impossible, Take down God, Infinite nothing, Evolve or Life on the back. It couldn’t be simpler. I have tested wearing an Ever 1 LUG necklace and it’s very good. You do not have to worry about feeling embarrassed or cringing about wearing an Ever 1 LUG necklace. This is because the necklace is nothing, came from nothing and means nothing (yet everything). Cringing and feeling embarrassed is the whole point! It’s modesty. It’s nothing! Wearing it makes you feel like nothing, 0 or a nothing being. It feels like you have done something to make amends for the Holocaust. It feels like you have done nothing wrong and have 0 sin. If someone asks you what the necklace means just say nothing! Therefore, because it makes you feel like nothing I highly recommend that you to get an Ever 1 LUG necklacemade. Remember, nothing or zero is the spirit or nirvana because it is also everything in the universe, therefore, wearing an Ever 1 LUG necklace is very spiritual. If you wear an Ever 1 LUG necklace, you can then say that you are a nothing being. The symbol of the Literally Universal God (LUG), using the 0 and ∞ symbols is fundamental and you can make your own version in any design you like as long as it has just the separate 0 and ∞ symbols, because that is fundamental. I also hghly recommend you get the words Ever 1, LUG, Nothing is impossible, Take down God, Infinite nothing, Evolve or Life engraved on the back. As far as I am aware there are no fundamental colours of the Ismlessism, however, remember as long as it has separate 0 and ∞ symbols you can design your own symbol of the Literally Universal God (LUG) in any way you like, because the symbol is fundamental. Also note you at least need a 24” silver chain otherwise you cannot see the pendant yourself. You may need to buy a different silver chain from somewhere else like Amazon for about £8.

Download the symbol of the Literally Universal God (LUG) on my website: https://ismless.com

You can get a never 1 LUG necklace made (for £40) here: https://yournamenecklace.co.uk 

Ever 1 LUG necklace (lesson from Buddha).

Also note that a symbol of the Literally Universal God (LUG) is fundamental and it includes all alien life in the universe, also 0 and ∞ is the mathematical name of the Literally Universal God (LUG). Literally Universal God (LUG), Jesus Christ, took down God to save the world. In church they look at death and worship the Lord. The cross is a constant reminder for the Romans that they murdered Jesus Christ. They must worship the Lord and be servile. Wear an Ever 1 LUG necklace (lesson from Buddha) instead of a cross and don’t serve God like a woman. I highly recommend that you get all Ever 1 LUG necklaces with a variety of engravings on the back such as: Ever 1, LUG, Nothing is impossible, Take down God, Infinite nothing, Evolve and Life.
One lesson from Buddha for Britain, the parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Her Majesty the Queen of England who does nothing is that you are rich forever and ever etc and that’s it!

Ismless + ism is separate.

The Ismlessism is a fundamental, universal and 0% biased religion that is above and a totally separate. Bare with me, but although the Ismlessism is closest to monotheism and Protestantism, I have to say in the first instance that the Ismlessism is not Protestant, it is alien, literally universal, fundamental and totally above of, on top of and separate from all regional and biased religions in the universe, including monotheistic Abrahamic religions. If the Ismlessism was Protestant how could aliens practice it? How could it be a fundamental religion for all sentient alien life in the universe? As you will see the nothing practices of the Ismlessism were developed and extrapolated entirely from Christianity, Buddhism, Judaism and Islam, however, the Ismlessism explains these practices in a new light which enables us to truly understand how and why we should practice them. 0 and ∞ is just an invisible layer of nothing on top of these practices of regional religions. To reiterate, the spiritual ractices of the Ismlessism of doing things for nothing or for the afterlife, spirits, space, the Literally Universal God (LUG) and for free of charge, are original to the Ismlessism, however, they were developed and extrapolated from the examples of the Jesus Christ’s teachings, the Buddha’s Great Renunciation, Christian and Buddhist practices of charity, prayer, fasting and Jewish and Muslim ritual purification (spiritual cleanliness). Therefore, because the Ismlessism is almost identical to Protestantism (the only difference being that the Ismlessism is mathematically 0 and ∞ or 0theism), hence, we could say that the Ismlessism is not totally separate from Protestantism, but is the totally pure, mathematical and fundamental perfection or culmination of Protestantism (with help from Buddhism)? Therefore, if we did meet aliens we could tell them that it was Protestantism (with help from Buddhism) which accomplished the Literally Universal Religion (LUR). We could say that Protestantism  mathematically perfected religion and attained the perfect religion. This is something that all Protestants would like to hear and say. Who the hell am I? I am not from space, I am a Protestant. I study and practice Judaism, Christianity, Buddhism and Islam. This version of the Ismlessism (in this essay) is almost identical to monotheistic Protestantism religion, however, you may be able to practice or develop the Ismlessism with polytheism. For example, Hindus may be able to produce a fundamental polytheistic Ismlessism and because the Literally Universal God (LUG) is 0 and ∞, Buddhists by all means may be able to produce a fundamental non-theistic Ismlessism. The mathematical perfection of Protestantism is 0 and ∞ or the fundamental conversion from 1 to 0 and ∞. However, saying all that about the perfection of Protestantism for aliens the perfect fundamental religion is separate from Protestantism. If the Ismlessism is above and totally separate from all regional and biased earth religions (including Abrahamic religions) then I believe that we can all have two religions, that is, the Ismlessism and our regional and biased earth religion. Therefore, like aliens, extreme Protestants are separate from all regional religions. Ismless + ism is separate spirituality.

Preface.
Introduction.
Fundamental and literal universality.
How Ismless + ism was discovered.
Re-inversion of valuations.
Learn from regional religions.
Literally Universal Religion (LUR).
How to get to space (practice nothing).
Different species (separation).
Conclusion.